Kuram ve Uygulamadaki Boşluğa Bir Bakış: İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmenliklerine Dair Değerlendirmeleri

Yıl 2019, Ekim 2019 Özel Sayısı, 116 - 129, 30.10.2019

Gülden İlin

https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.603392

Öz

Bu çalışma
İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Bölümü 3. Sınıf öğrencilerin öğretmenlik uygulamalarına
dair farkındalıklarını hızlandırmak amacıyla ‘Çocuklara İngilizce Öğretimi’
dersinde yapılan mikro öğretim uygulamalarını incelemektedir. Bu uygulamalar
sırasında toplam 72 öğrencinin en sık kullandığı 45 olumlu veya olumsuz öğretmen
davranışı tanımlanmış ve bu davranışlar temel alınarak, hayali bir öğretmenin
bir dersinin metni yaratılmıştır. Sonrasında bu hayali ders metni bir sınav
formunda öğrencilere verilerek 45 öğretmen davranışından istedikleri herhangi
20 tanesini olumlu ya da olumsuz olarak yorumlamaları istenmiştir. Sınav
kâğıtlarının analizinde öğrencilerin mikro öğretim sunularında gözlemlenen
öğretmenlik davranışları ile aynı davranışların kâğıt üzerindeki yorumlamaları
arasında bir uyumsuzluk olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Öğrencilerle kuram ve uygulama
arasındaki boşluğun nedenleri, dört aylık bu sürecin öğretmenliklerine dair
anlayışlarına olan etkileri tartışılmıştır. 
Bu tartışmaların saha notları çalışmanın bir diğer veri kaynağı olarak
kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin deneyim ve güven eksiklikleri, utangaçlık, heyecan
ve sınav üzerinde yapılan değerlendirmenin öğrencilerin geldikleri sistemle uyuşuyor olması çalışma
sonuçlarına yön veren etkenler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

yabancı dil öğretmen eğitimi, yansıtıcı uygulama, öz-değerlendirme, akran değerlendirme, öğretmenlerin mesleki bilgileri

Mirroring the Gap between Theory and Practice: ELT Juniors’ Auto-Criticism on their Teaching

Öz

To
trigger the ELT sophomores’ awareness on their teaching practices, in the
Teaching English to Young Learners course, most frequent 45 positive and
negative teaching practices of 72 students were identified during their micro
teaching sessions. On the basis of these, a script of an imaginary session of
an anonymous teacher was created. Then, as a sit-down exam, the students were
asked to criticize any 20 out of 45 behaviors in the script. Analysis of the
exam papers revealed a mismatch in how students conducted their lessons and how
they evaluated the same teaching practice. The discrepancies in theory and
practice and the consequences of this procedure on students’ understanding of
their own teaching were discussed with the students. Field notes of these discussions
constituted another data source. Lacking in experience and confidence, feeling
of shyness and nervousness and finally the exam, harmonizing with the existing
educational system through which the students came to the university, appeared
to be the underlying reasons for the results. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Language Teacher Education, Reflective Practice, Teachers’ Self-Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge

Kaynakça

• Baksh, S. (2016). “Using Games as a Tool in Teaching Vocabulary to Young Learners.” English Language Teaching. Vol.9 No.7 DOI: 10.5539/elt. v9n7p120
• Barahmeh M. Y. (2016). “A Study of Sources of EFL Student Teachers’ Anxiety During their Practicum Experience.” European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 4 No. 1, 2016
• Borg, S. (2003). “Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe, and Do.” Language Teaching, 36 (2), 81–109.
• Cameron, L. (2001). “Teaching Languages to Young Learners.” U. K. Cambridge University Press.
• Council of Higher Education English Language Teaching Undergraduate Programme Retrieved 10.10.2018 at: http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/41805112/Ingilizce_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi.pdf
• Elo, S. and Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing. 62(1) 107- 115.
• Eroz-Tuga, B. (2013). “Reflective Feedback Sessions Using Video Recordings.” ELT Journal 67 (2), 175-183.
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). “Promoting Reflective Practice in Initial English Language Teacher Education: Reflective Microteaching.” Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 18, 1–15.
• Farrell, T. S.C. (2011). “Keeping SCORE': Reflective Practice through Classroom Observations.” RELC Journal 42: 265 DOI: 10.1177/0033688211419396
• Gabriele, J. (2007). “Teachers' Reflections on Their Reform-Based Teaching in Mathematics: Implications for the Development of Teacher Self-Efficacy.” Action in Teacher Education. Jan. pp. 60-74
• Galloway, D. and Edwards, A. (2015). “Primary School Teaching and Educational Psychology.” London: Routledge
• Hong, J. Y. (2010). “Pre-service and Beginning Teachers’ Professional Identity and Its Relation to Dropping Out of the Profession.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 1530-1543
• Ilin, G. (2003). “A Model for Effective Supervision from the Supervisor and Sudent –teachers’ Perspective: A Social Constructivist Perspective.” PhD diss .,Çukurova University. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation.
• Ilin, G. (2015). “Research Experience as A Decoder for the Trajectory of ELT Student-Teachers’ Perceptional Change.” Journal of Education and Human development 4(4), 169-176., Doi: 10.15640/jehd. v4n4a20
• Ilin, G. (2016). “Effects of a Doctorate Program on a Novice Teacher's Conceptualisation of an Effective Teacher: A Case Study.” Educational Research and Reviews,11(7), 411-419., Doi: 10.5897/ERR2015.2619
• Lee, H.J. (2005). “Understanding and Assessing Preservice Teachers ‘Reflective Thinking”. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21 699–715
• May M.H. Cheng, Kwok-Wai Chan, Sylvia Y.F. Tang, Annie Y.N. Cheng (2008). “Pre-service Teacher Education Students’ Epistemological Beliefs and Their Conceptions of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education. 25 (2009) 319–327
• Mc Kay, S.L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Merc, A. (2011). “Sources of Foreign Language Student Teacher: A Qualitative Inquiry.” Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 80-94.
• McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive development. Retrieved 22.04.2019, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
• Munby, H.; Russell, T. and Martin, A. K. (2001). “Teachers’ Knowledge and How It Develops, in Richardson, V.” (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. 4th Edition. American Educational Research Association.
• Pajares, F. (2002). “Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning.” Theory into Practice, 41:2, 116-125, DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
• Pinter, A. (2006). “Teaching Young Language Learners.” Oxford: OUP
• Prensky, M. (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” On the Horizon MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001
• Richards, J. C. (2008). “Second Language Education Today.” RELC Journal, 39, 158–177.
• Richards, J.C. and Lockhart, C. (2004). “Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms.” U.S.A. Cambridge University Press.
• Salaberri, S. (1995). “ClassroomLanguage.” Oxford: Heinemann.
• Schön, D. (1983). “The reflective practitioner.” New York: Basic Books.
• Scott, W.A. and Ytreberg, L.H. (2004). “Teaching English to children.” U.K. Longman
• Schulman, L. (1986). “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.” Educational Researcher Volume: 15 issue: 2, page(s): 4-14 Issue published: February 1, 1986
• Tezgiden, Cakcak, Y. (2016). “A Critical Review of Teacher Education Models.” International Journal of Educational Policies. 10 (2), pp.121- 140.
• Tülüce,S. H., and Çeçen, S. (2016). “Scrutinizing practicum for a more powerful teacher education: A longitudinal study with pre-service teachers.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,16,127-151.
• Wallace, M.J. (1991). “Training Foreign Language Teachers: A Reflective Approach.” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Watson, G. (2006). “Technology Professional Development: Long-Term Effects on Teacher Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. Vol.14 Iss. 1, 151-165.
• Westwood, P. (1996). “Teachers’ Beliefs.” Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities. Volume 1. Issue 2.
• Wood, K. C., Smith, H., Grossniklaus, D. (2001). Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved 22.04.2019, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
• Verloop, N., van Driel, J. & Meijer, P. C. (2001). “Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
• Yildirim, A. (2013). “Teacher Education Research in Turkey: Trends, Issues and Priority Areas.” Education and Science Vol. 38, No 169 pp. 175-191.