Derleme

DNA Barcoding in Forensic Entomology: A Molecular Tool That Increases Reliability in Estimating the Postmortem Interval

Sayı: 2026 28 Şubat 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

DNA Barcoding in Forensic Entomology: A Molecular Tool That Increases Reliability in Estimating the Postmortem Interval

Abstract

Forensic entomology has become an indispensable tool for estimating the postmortem interval (PMI), particularly in advanced stages of decomposition where classical forensic methods are limited. Reliable PMI estimation requires accurate and precise identification of insect evidence. Traditional morphological approaches often fail when dealing with immature stages (eggs, larvae, pupae), closely related species, or partially damaged specimens. To overcome these limitations, DNA barcoding has been increasingly integrated into forensic entomology over the past two decades. DNA barcoding typically relies on sequencing a standardized fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene and comparing the obtained sequence with reference databases such as BOLD and GenBank to assign species identity. In this review, we summarize the theoretical basis of DNA barcoding in forensic entomology, the genetic markers employed, and the main steps of sampling, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequence analysis. We present application examples from Diptera and Coleoptera, and discuss how DNA barcoding contributes to PMI estimation and case reconstruction. Furthermore, we address recent developments such as mini-barcode strategies, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)/metabarcoding approaches, multi-locus barcoding, and highlight key limitations including database gaps, the barcode gap concept, contamination, and NUMTs. We also evaluate the current situation in Türkiye and propose the establishment of a national barcode reference library for forensically relevant insect taxa. Overall, DNA barcoding emerges as a powerful molecular tool that complements rather than replaces morphology, thereby improving the reliability of species identification and PMI estimations in forensic casework.

Keywords

Forensic entomology , DNA barcoding , COI , postmortem interval , molecular species identification

Kaynakça

  1. Abu El-Hassan, G.M.M., Abo El-Ela, R.H., Sawaby, R., El- Hamouly, H., El Sawaf, B.M. & Ghallab, E.H. (2025). Morphology, molecular phylogeny and record verification of Sarcophaga ruficornis Fabricius (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) from Egypt. Scientific Reports, 15, 40357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 025-25934-0
  2. Adnan, A., Mona, S., Rakha, A., Nazir, S., Wang, H., & Ren, F. (2025). Molecular diversity of three forensically relevant dipterans from cadavers in Lahore, Pakistan. Insects, 16, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040381
  3. Alam, M., Abbas, K., Raza, M.T., & Husain, A. (2024). Forensic entomology: A comprehensive review on insect-based approaches in criminal forensics. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 19(1), 132-145.
  4. Altunsoy, F., Turan, Y., Fırat, S., & Sert, O. (2017). Differences in succession of Coleoptera species attracted to pig carcasses in rural and urban habitats in Eskişehir Province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 41(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.16970/ted.65825
  5. Amendt, J., Campobasso, C.P., Gaudry, E., Reiter, C., LeBlanc, H.N., & Hall, M.J.R. (2007). Best practice in forensic entomology-Standards and guidelines. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 121(2), 90– 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0086-x
  6. Bana, R., & Beyarslan, A. (2012). Determination of Coleoptera Species of Pig Carcasses and Internal Organs of Bovine in Edirne City of Turkey. BEU Journal of Science 1(2), 122-126.
  7. Chimeno, C., Morinière, J., Podhorna J., Hardulak L., Hausmann, A., Reckel, F., Grunwald, J.E., Randolph P., & Haszprunar, G. (2019). DNA Barcoding in Forensic Entomology - Establishing a DNA Reference Library of Potentially Forensic Relevant Arthropod Species. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(2), 593-601. http://doi.org/10.1111/1556- 4029.13869
  8. Ceylan, A.Z. (2020). Adli önemi olan Diptera türlerinin mtDNA COI gen analizi ile genetik teşhisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye, 81s.
  9. Dupuis J.R., Roe A.D., & Sperling F.A. (2012). Multi-locus species delimitation in closely related animals and fungi: one marker is not enough. Mol. Ecol., 21(18), 4422-36. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 294X.2012.05642.x
  10. Eenhakkattu Mana, A.S., Jiang, S., Abaffy, T., Matsunami,barcoding on digital microfluidic biochips. Journal of Hardware and Systems Security, 9, 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41635-025-00167-9.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kabalak, M., & Turan, Y. (2026). DNA Barcoding in Forensic Entomology: A Molecular Tool That Increases Reliability in Estimating the Postmortem Interval. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2026. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1840921