Peer Review Process

Submission – The author submits the manuscript through the DergiPark system.

Initial Check – The editorial team reviews the manuscript for compliance with journal policies, formatting, and plagiarism screening.

Editor Assignment – The manuscript is assigned to an editor who evaluates its suitability for peer review.

Reviewer Selection – At least two independent reviewers are selected based on their expertise.

Review Process – Reviewers evaluate the manuscript, providing comments and recommendations (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, Reject).

Author Revisions – If revisions are requested, the author updates the manuscript accordingly.

Second Review (if necessary) – The revised manuscript is re-evaluated by reviewers.

Final Decision – The editor makes the final decision based on the reviewers' feedback.

Proofreading and Publication – If accepted, the article undergoes proofreading and is prepared for publication.

Editorial Review Process 

Submission Check – The editorial board ensures the manuscript meets journal guidelines.

Scope Evaluation – The editor assesses whether the manuscript fits the journal's scope and quality standards.

Plagiarism Check – The manuscript is checked for originality through plagiarism detection software.

Initial Editorial Decision – The editor decides whether to proceed with peer review or reject the manuscript outright.

Language and Formatting Check – The manuscript is reviewed for language clarity, grammar, and adherence to journal formatting.

Peer Review Process – If approved, the manuscript is sent to reviewers.

Editorial Revisions – After peer review, the editor may request additional revisions before final acceptance.

Final Decision – The editor makes the final decision (Accept, Revise, Reject).

Pre-Publication Review – Final proofreading and technical formatting are completed before publication.