AN EVALUATION OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON ONLINE MATERIAL PREPARATION TRAINING THROUGH MOOC AND BLENDED EDUCATION MODEL

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: Special Issue-IODL, 4 - 11, 17.07.2020

Ahmet Arnavut Huseyin Bıcen Vasfi Tugun

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770887

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to increase the awareness of primary, secondary and high school teachers regarding Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) as well as to help them to benefit from these media and to determine their opinions about these courses. As a result of the study, the results of the MOOC media through which the experimental group was trained and the blended learning training model of the control group were compared. Therefore, the aim is to provide guidance for the continual discussions about the effectiveness of MOOC. In the study, blended training was given to 33 teachers, whereas a complete online course on a formed platform was given to 34 teachers; consequently, the opinions and the success levels of the teachers were compared. The resulting data of the study was obtained from an opinion scale given to the teachers as well as a media evaluation form. The obtained qualitative and quantitative data were analysed and have been presented in the findings section.

Keywords

Massive Open Online Courses, MOOC, Blended Learning, Teachers, Web Based Learning, Moodle

References

• Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change. Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved on 28.09.018 from: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013
• Aparicio, M., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Painho, M. (2019). Gamification: A key determinant of massive open online course (MOOC) success. Information & Management, 56(1), 39-54. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.06.003
• Aydin, C. H. (2017). Current Status of the MOOC Movement in the World and Reaction of the Turkish Higher Education Institutions. Open Praxis, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.463
• Bakayev, V., Vasilyeva, V., Kalmykova, S., & Razinkina, E. (2018). Theory of physical culture-a massive open online course in educational process. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(1), 293-297. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.01039
• Bozkurt, A. (2015). Kitlesel acik cevrimici dersler (Massive Open Online Courses-MOOC) ve sayisal bilgi caginda yasamboyu ogrenme firsati. Acikogretim Uygulamalari ve Arastirmalari Dergisi, 1(1), 56-81. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/3030/42090
• Cormier, D., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & McAuley, A. (2010). What is a MOOC? Retreived on 28.08.2019 from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gMGqcZQc
• Downes, S. (2008). Connectivism: A theory of personal learning. Retreived on 28.08.19 from: https://www.slideshare.net/Downes/connectivism-a-theory-of-personal-learning
• Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada.
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Gagne, R. M. (1973). Review of research in education. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
• LeCounte, J. F., Nafukho, F., Valentin, M., Johnson, D. & Valentin, C. (2015). The MOOC: Characteristics, Benefits, and Challenges. Handbook of Research on Innovative Technology Integration in Higher Education, 228. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8170-5.ch011
• McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice.
• Ongel, E. (1975). Faktor Cozumune Giris: Onemli Bilesen Cozumu ve Uygulamasi. Ankara. Turkey.
• Patterson, R. W. (2018). Can behavioral tools improve online student outcomes? Experimental evidence from a massive open online course. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 153, 293-321. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.06.017
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
• Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD Learning News, 10(1), 1-28.
• Simsek, E., I. & Turan, B. O. (2017). Mobil Ortamlarda Kitlesel Acik Cevrimici Derslerin (KACD) Kullanilabilirliginin Degerlendirilmesi. Mersin University, Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.336745
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
• Usta, E. (2007). Harmanlanmis ogrenme ve cevrimici ogrenme ortamlarinin akademik basari ve doyuma etkisi. (Unpublished PHD Thesis) Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
• Unsal, H. (2012). Harmanlanmis Ogrenmenin Basari ve Motivasyona Etkisi. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 10(1), 1-27.