Bilimin Doğasını Öğretmede Bilim Haberleri Kullanmanın Etkileri

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 24, 446 - 475, 21.10.2024

Büşra Aslangöz , Özgecan Kırık

https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1479639

Öz

Bu çalışma, bilimin doğası öğretiminde bilim haberleri kullanmasının, fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğasını anlamalarına, evrensel fen okuryazarlıklarına ve medya okuryazarlıklarına etkisini araştırmaktadır. Araştırma, eşitlenmemiş kontrol gruplu desen kullanılarak 55 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Deney grubunda sosyo-bilimsel konular (SBK) temelinde bilimsel gazete haberleri kullanılarak bilimin doğası öğretilirken, kontrol grubunda gazete haberleri olmaksızın, yalnızca SBK kullanılarak öğretilmiştir. Veriler, “Bilimin Doğası Ölçeği”, “Evrensel Fen Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği” ve “Medya Okuryazarlığı Becerileri Ölçeği” ile toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, SBK bağlamında bilimin doğası öğretiminde bilim haberleri kullanmasının, yalnızca sosyo-bilimsel konu bağlamında yapılan öğretime kıyasla fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının medya okuryazarlığı boyutlarından değerlendirme becerisini geliştirdiğini göstermektedir. Diğer yandan, bilim haberlerinin kullanmasının bilimin doğası anlayışları ve evrensel fen okuryazarlığına anlamlı bir etkisi olmamıştır. Bu durum, her iki grupta da SBK kullanılmasıyla açıklanabilir. Çalışma sonuçlarına dayanarak çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilim haberleri, bilimin doğası, fen okuryazarlığı, medya okuryazarlığı, sosyo-bilimsel konular

Etik Beyan

Etik Kurul Belgesi Etik Kurul Komisyon Adı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu Etik Kurul Belge Tarihi ve Protokol No: 30/03/2022-19

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmanın bir kısmı, 22-25 Haziran 2022’de İzmir’de IX. International Eurasian Educational Research (EJER) Congress’te sunulmuştur.

The Effects of Using Science News in Teaching the Nature of Science

Öz

This study examines the impact of incorporating science news into the teaching of nature of science (NOS) on pre-service science teachers' understanding of NOS, universal scientific literacy, and media literacy. A total of 55 pre-service science teachers participated in the study following a non-equivalent control group design. The experimental group was taught NOS using science news in socio-scientific contexts, whereas the control group received NOS instruction solely through socio-scientific issues (SSIs) without science news. Data were gathered using the “Nature of Science Scale”, “Global Science Literacy Scale”, and “Media Literacy Skills Scale”. The findings indicate that integrating science news when teaching NOS alongside SSIs enhances pre-service teachers' evaluation skills related to media literacy compared to teaching only within socio-scientific contexts. However, incorporating science news did not significantly impact NOS understanding or global scientific literacy, likely due to both groups addressing similar SSIs. Recommendations were made based on the study's results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science news, nature of science, scientific literacy, media literacy, socio-scientific issues

Etik Beyan

Etik Kurul Komisyon Adı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Alanında Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu Etik Kurul Belge Tarihi ve Karar No: 30.03.2022/19

Kaynakça

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785-810. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10143
• Adal, E. E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2023). Investigation of preservice science teachers’ nature of science understanding and decision making on socioscientific issue through the fractal model. Science & Education, 32(2), 529-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00319-1
• Aufderheide, P. (1993) Media literacy: A report on the National Leadership Conference on media literacy. Aspen Institute.
• Austin, E. W., P. Borah, & S. Domgaard. (2021). COVID-19 disinformation and political engagement among communities of color: The role of media literacy. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1 (7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-58
• Cakmakci, G. & Yalaki, Y. (2012). Promoting student teachers’ ideas about nature of science through popular media. S-TEAM / NTNU.
• Chen, S. Y., & Liu, S. Y. (2018). Reinforcement of scientific literacy through effective argumentation on an energy-related environmental issue. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1625. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95171
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
• Çelik, C. (2016). Evrensel fen okuryazarlık ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması ve öğretmen adaylarının evrensel fen okuryazarlık düzeyi. [Yüksek lisans Tezi]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi.
• Demirdöğen, B., & Aydın-Günbatar, S. (2021). Teaching nature of science through the use of media reports on COVID-19. Science Activities, 58(3), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2021.1957757
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.
• Elliott, P. (2006). Reviewing newspaper articles as a technique for enhancing the scientific literacy of student-teachers. International Journal of Science Education 28 (11), 1245– 65.
• Erdem, C. (2018). Öğretmen adayları için medya okuryazarlığı dersi öğretim programı tasarısı. [Doktora Tezi]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Fooladi, E. C. 2020. Between education and opinion-making. Science & Education, 29 (5), 1117–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00156-0
• García-Carmona, A. (2021). Learning about the nature of science through the critical and reflective reading of news on the COVID-19 pandemic. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(4), 1015-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10092-2
• García-Carmona, A., & Acevedo Díaz, J. A. (2016). Learning about the nature of science using newspaper articles with scientific content. Science & Education, 25, 523-546.
• Gay L. R. & Airasian P., (2000), Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Prentice-Hall Inc
• Green, S.B., Sulkind, N.J., & Akey, T.M. (2000). Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and understanding data (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Ginosar, A., & Tal, T. (2018). Teaching journalistic texts in science classes: The importance of media literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(3), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9718-9
• Herman, B. C., Poor, S. V., Oertli, R. T., & Schulte, K. (2023). Promoting young learners’ NOS views through place-based SSI instruction. Science & Education, 32(4), 947-992.
• Huang, H. Y., H. L. Wu, H. C. She, and Y. R. Lin. 2014. Enhancing students’ NOS views and science knowledge using Facebook based scientific news. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,17 (4), 289–301.
• Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy using news media in the classroom. Open University Press.
• Jolls, T. and Wilson, C. (2014). The core concepts: fundamental to media literacy yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(2), 68-78.
• Karakaya, E., & İrez, O. S. (2022). The relationship between understanding the nature of scientific knowledge and reasoning and decision making in socioscientific issues. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(4), 1329-1358.
• Khishfe, R. (2022). Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in socioscientific and scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 647-673.
• Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
• Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). 'To trust or not to trust,…'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102
• Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., ... & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20133
• Köseoğlu, F., Atasoy, B., Kavak, N., Akkuş, H., Budak, E., Tümay, H., Kadayıfçı, H., Taşdelen, U., (2003). Yapılandırıcı öğrenme ortamı için: Bir fen ders kitabı nasıl olmalı. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kurt, A. A., & Kürüm, D. (2010). Medya okuryazarlığı ve eleştirel düşünme arasındaki ilişki: Kavramsal bir bakış. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (2), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.92802
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
• Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831– 879). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
• Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10045
• McComas, W., Clough, M. P. & Almazroa, H. (1998) The role and character of the nature of science in science education, in W. McComas (ed.) The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4 ve 5. sınıflar) öğretim programı. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In D. Tippins, M. Mueller, M. van Eijck, & J. Adams (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 105–128). Springer.
• Mun, K., Shin, N., Lee, H., Kim, S. W., Choi, K., Choi, S. Y. & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Korean secondary students’ perception of scientific literacy as global citizens: Using global scientific literacy questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1739-1766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045956
• Murcia, K. (2009). Science in the news: An evaluation of students' scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 55(3), 40-45.
• Norris, S. P., L. M. Phillips, & C. A. Korpan. 2003. University students’ interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty. Public Understanding of Science, 12 (2), 123–45.
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310909
• Oliveras, B., Márquez, C., & Sanmartí, N. (2013). The use of newspaper articles as a tool to develop critical thinking in science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 885-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586736
• Özgelen, S. (2013). Bilimin doğası ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(2), 711- 736.
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Open University Press
• Pérez Tornero, J. M., Celot P. & Varis T. (2007). Current trends and approaches to media literacy in Europe. European Commission.
• Ruiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. (1999). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/030572499103278
• Schmidt, H. C. (2013). Media literacy education from kindergarten to college: A comparison of how media literacy is addressed across the educational system. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-5-1-3
• Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth ofscientific literacy. Rutgers University Press.
• Shibley, I. A. (2003). Using newspapers to examine the nature of science. Science & Education, 12 (7), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025687424931
• Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. State University of New York Press.
• Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2005). Literacy for the 21st century: An overview and orientation guide to media literacy education. Part I: Theory. Center for Media Literacy. www.medialit.org/cml-medialit-kit
• Wellington, J. (1991). Newspaper science, school science: Friends or enemies?. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130401
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In: N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 697–726).
• Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science & Education, 17, 799-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6