The Parallel Mediation of Emotion Regulation Difficulty and Meaning-Based Coping between Need for Relatedness and Mental Well-Being

Öz

Individuals aim to achieve well-being goals such as developing positive emotions, achieving life satisfaction, and self-actualization despite the challenges in their lives. Unmet needs in social relationships and the lack of meaningful coping strategies can lead to a decrease in mental well-being. This situation may result in difficulties in emotion regulation and, overall, lower levels of mental well-being. The purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties and meaning-based coping between need for relatedness and mental well-being. The study sample consists of 419 Turkish adults, including 169 men and 250 women, with an average age of 24.17 years (SD = 7.62). Need for Relatedness Scale (Ünal-Karagüven et al., 2020), the Mental Well-Being Scale (Demirtaş & Baytemir, 2019), the Emotion Regulation Difficulties Scale (Ekşi & Erik, 2023), and the Meaning-Based Coping Scale (Arslan & Yıldırım, 2021) were used in the study. The analysis revealed that emotion regulation difficulties and meaning-based coping partially mediate the relationship between need for relatedness and mental well-being in adults. This indicates that mental well-being is both directly and indirectly predicted by need for relatedness through emotion regulation difficulties and meaning-based coping.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Well-Being
• Need for Relatedness
• Emotion Regulation
• Meaning-Based Coping

Sosyal İlişki Gereksinimi ile Mental İyi Oluş Arasında Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü ve Anlam Temelli Başa Çıkmanın Paralel Aracılığı

Öz

Bireyler, yaşamlarındaki zorluklara rağmen olumlu duygular geliştirme, hayattan tatmin olma ve kendini gerçekleştirme gibi iyilik hali hedefler. Sosyal ilişkilerdeki gereksinimlerin karşılanmaması ve anlamlı başa çıkma stratejilerinin eksikliği, mental iyi oluşun azalmasına yol açabilir. Bu durum, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerine ve genel anlamda daha düşük bir mental iyi oluş seviyesine neden olabilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı Mental İyi Oluş ile Sosyal İlişki Gereksinimi Arasında Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü ve Anlam Temelli Başa Çıkmanın aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Araştırma 169 erkek, 250 kadın Türk yetişkin bireyden toplam 419 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılar ortalama 24.17 yaşındadır (SD = 7.62).Araştırma kapsamında Sosyal İlişki Gereksinimi Ölçeği (Ünal-Karagüven vd., 2020), Mental İyi Oluş Ölçeği (Demirtaş ve Baytemir, 2019), Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü Ölçeği (Ekşi ve Erik, 2023) ve Anlam Temelli Başa Çıkma Ölçeği (Arslan ve Yıldırım, 2021) kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda yetişkinlerin sosyal ilişki gereksinimi ile mental iyi oluş arasında duygu düzenleme güçlüğü ve anlam temelli başa çıkmanın kısmi aracılık rolü tespit edilmiştir. Bu durum mental iyi oluşun sosyal ilişki gereksinimini doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak duygu düzenleme güçlüğü ve anlam temelli başa çıkma vasıtasıyla yordamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İyi Oluş
• Sosyal İlişki Gereksinimi
• Duygu Düzenleme
• Anlam Temelli Başa Çıkma

Kaynakça

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317-332.
2. Arslan, G. (2020). Meaning-based coping and spiritual well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating effects on subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 602542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602542
3. Arslan, G., & Yıldırım, M. (2021a). Coronavirus stress, meaningful living, optimism, and depressive symptoms: A study of moderated mediation model. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(6), 2050–2061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00434-8
4. Arslan, G., & Yıldırım, M. (2021b). Meaning-based coping and spirituality during the COVID-19 pandemic: mediating effects on subjective well-being. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 646572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646572
5. Ateş, B. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinde akademik başarinin yordayicisi olarak psikolojik iyi oluş ve sosyal yetkinlik. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1203-1214. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263225
6. Bordbar, M. (2021). Autonomy-supportive faculty, students' self-system processes, positive academic emotions, and agentic engagement: Adding emotions to self-system model of motivational development. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727794.
7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
8. Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H., Brown, T. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006). Acceptability and suppression of negative emotion in anxiety and mood disorders. Emotion, 6(4), 587–595.

9. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
10. Cohrdes, C., Pryss, R., Baumeister, H., Eicher, S., Knoll, N., & Hölling, H. (2023). Support-and meaning-focused coping as key factors for maintaining adult quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1196404.
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press.
12. Demirtaş, A. S., & Baytemir, K. (2019). Warwick-edinburgh mental iyi oluş ölçeği kisa formu’nun türkçe’ye uyarlanmasi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalişmasi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(70), 689-701. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.432708
13. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
14. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
15. Düşünceli, B., Kaya, G. Ö., & Yaşa Sumeli, M. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinin mental iyi oluş düzeylerinin bağlanma stillerine göre incelenmesi. Ege Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.58637/egebad.1378646
16. Eisenbeck, N., Carreno, D. F., & Pérez-Escobar, J. A. (2021). Meaning-centered coping in the era of COVID-19: direct and moderating effects on depression, anxiety, and stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648383
17. Ekşi, H., & Erik, C. (2023, 20-21 July). Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-8: Adaptation to Turkish [Paper Presentation]. 2nd International Congress of Educational Sciences and Linguists, Warsaw, Poland.
18. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 269-314.
19. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 647-654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647
20. Gonzalez, R., Campos, J. A., & Jara, L. (2010). Social support and coping with negative emotions: A review of the literature. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 27(2), 123–133.
21. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JPBA.0000007455.08539.94
22. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
23. Gross, J. J., & Munoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(2), 151–164.
24. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72(3), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d61e4b
25. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
26. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080 /10705519909540118
27. Jang, H., Lee, S., & Song, R. (2015). The role of social support in coping with stress: The impact of social support on emotion regulation. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(5), 684–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313516650
28. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
29. Kraiss, J. T., Ten Klooster, P. M., Moskowitz, J. T., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2020). The relationship between emotion regulation and well-being in patients with mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 102, 152189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152189
30. Lin, J. H. (2016). Need for relatedness: A self-determination approach to examining attachment styles, Facebook use, and psychological well-being. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1126749
31. Mak, W. W., Ng, I. S., & Wong, C. C. (2011). Resilience: enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4), 610-617.
32. Parkinson, B., Fischer, A., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Psychology Press.
33. Pargament, K. I., Smith, B. W., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. (2000). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(4), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00046
34. Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning-making and its effects on adjustment to stress and coping. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
35. Park, C. L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 357–379). Guilford Press.
36. Penner, F., Steinberg, L., & Sharp, C. (2023). The development and validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation Scale-8: providing respondents with a uniform context that elicits thinking about situations requiring emotion regulation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(5), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2133722
37. Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 368-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048
38. Richer, S. and Vallerand, R.J. (1998). Construction and validation of the perceived relatedness scale. Revue Européene de Psychologie Appliquée, 48, 129–137.
39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
40. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford.
41. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
42. Santini, Z. I., Koyanagi, A., Tyrovolas, S., Mason, C., & Haro, J. M. (2015). The association between social relationships and depression: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.049
43. Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 890-900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017896
44. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th. ed.). Pearson Education.
45. Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
46. Tull, M. T., Barrett, H. M., McMillan, E. S., & Roemer, L. (2007). A preliminary investigation of the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Behavior Therapy, 38(3), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.10.001
47. Uchino, B. N. (2006). Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5
48. Ünal-karagüven, M. H., Karaman-Ekşioğlu, M., & Gül, Ç. (2020). Özerklik teorisi ve sosyal ilişki gereksinimi ölçeğinin Türkçeye adaptasyonu. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (6), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.656251
49. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678-691.
50. Yılmaz, A., & Ağgön, E. (2023). Aktif spor yapan üniversite öğrencilerinin beden memnuniyeti, mental iyi oluş ve özgüven düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1185626