Turba ve Tüy Bazlı Yem Katkı Maddelerinin Adler Gümüş Yumurta Tavuklarında Sindirim ve Üreme Organlarının Gelişimine Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı turba ve tüy kökenli geleneksel olmayan organik yem katkı maddelerinin Adler gümüşü yumurtacı tavuklarda sindirim ve üreme organlarının gelişimi üzerine etkilerini araştırmaktır. Toplam 180 adet bir günlük yaştaki civcivler, kontrol grubu (temel karma yem) ve iki deneme grubu olacak şekilde üç gruba ayrılmıştır. Araştırma gruplarına sırasıyla turba bazlı katkı maddesi (1 kg/ton) ve tüy bazlı katkı maddesi (2 kg/ton) içeren rasyonlar verilmiştir. Araştırmanın 180. gününde sindirim sistemi ve üreme organlarına ait morfometrik ölçümler yapılmıştır. Araştırma gruplarında, özellikle ince bağırsak ve duodenum uzunluğunda kontrol grubuna kıyasla belirgin artışlar tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, ovaryum ağırlığı ve ovidukt uzunluğu deneme gruplarında anlamlı düzeyde artmış olup, bu durum üreme sisteminin daha iyi geliştiğini ve yumurtlama dönemine fizyolojik olarak daha hazır olunduğunu göstermektedir. İncelenen organlarda herhangi bir patolojik değişikliğe rastlanmamış, kullanılan yem katkı maddelerinin hayvan sağlığı ve performans üzerinde olumsuz bir etki oluşturmadığı belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, turba ve tüy bazlı organik yem katkı maddelerinin Adler gümüşü yumurtacı tavuklarda sindirim ve üreme organlarının gelişimini olumlu yönde etkileyebileceği ve kanatlı beslemede alternatif yem katkıları olarak değerlendirilebileceği ortaya konmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sindirim organları
• Ovidukt
• Yumurtacı tavuklar

Effects of Peat and Feather-Based Feed Additives on Digestive and Reproductive Organ Development in Adler Silver Laying Hens

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of non-traditional organic feed additives derived from peat and feathers on the development of digestive and reproductive organs in Adler Silver laying hens. A total of 180 one-day-old hens were randomly allocated into three groups: a control group fed a basal compound feed, and two treatment groups receiving the basal diet supplemented with either a peat-based additive (1 kg/ton) or a feather-based additive (2 kg/ton). At 180 days of age, morphometric measurements of the digestive tract and reproductive organs were performed. Hens receiving both feed additives exhibited enhanced development of the digestive system, including increased length of the small intestine and duodenum compared with the control group. Furthermore, supplementation resulted in a significant increase in ovary mass and oviduct length, indicating improved reproductive system development and physiological readiness for egg production. No pathological alterations were observed in the examined organs, suggesting that the additives did not adversely affect the hens’ health status. The findings demonstrated that peat and feather-based organic feed additives can positively influence digestive and reproductive organs development in laying hens, highlighting their potential as alternative components in poultry nutrition strategies.

Keywords

• Hens
• Digestive organs
• Oviduct

Kaynakça

1. Abdelli, N., Solà-Oriol, D., & Pérez, J. F. (2021). Phytogenic feed additives in poultry: Achievements, prospective and challenges. Animals, 11, 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123471
2. Arif, M., Alagawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Saeed, M., Arain, M. A., & Elnesr, S. S. (2019). Humic acid as a feed additive in poultry diets: A review. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 20(3), 167-172.
3. Bochenkova, N. (1974). Birdwatcher's Guidebook. Moscow: Moscow Worker Publisher. 208 p. (In Russian).
4. Bogdanov, M. (1976). Textbook for a Poultry Operator. Egg Production. 2nd edition. Moscow: Kolos. 336 p. (In Russian).
5. Caisin, L. (2021). The Efficiency of Using Peat as a Feed Supplement in Compound Feed for Chickens. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, 2(45), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2021.2.4
6. Caisin, L., Scripnic, E., Bivol, L., Aljabar, H., & Cara, A. (2025). Use of Feather Meal as a Protein Source in Broiler Chicken Nutrition. Recommendations. Chisinau: Print-Caro; Technical University of Moldova, Ministry of Education and Research of the Republic of Moldova, 48 p. ISBN 978-5-85748-153-0.
7. Etches, R. J. (1996). Reproduction in poultry. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
8. Geyra, A., & Uni, Z. (2001). Changes in intestinal morphology and absorptive surface of the chicken small intestine during the first days posthatch. Poultry Science, 80(4), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.4.538

9. Hreško Šamudovská, A., Hreško, S., Maskaľová, I., Tvrdá, A., & Bujňák, L. (2025). The use of humic substances as an additive to feed mixtures in pheasant breeding. Animals, 15(15), 2321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152321
10. Iji, P. A., Hughes, R. J., Choct, M., & Tivey, D. R. (2001). Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on wheat-based diets supplemented with enzymes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(8), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01012
11. Ivanov, A., Papunidi K., & Tremasov M. (2014). The use of succinic acid and preparations based on it. Monograph. FTSTRB. Kazan, 183 p. (In Russian).
12. Jha, R., & Mishra, P. (2021). Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: A review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00576-0
13. Johnson, A. L. (2000). Reproduction in the female. In C. G. Whittow (Ed.), Sturkie’s avian physiology (5th ed., pp. 569-596). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Kolesnik, E., & Derkho, M. (2014) Estimation of metabolic intensity and body weight gain in broiler chickens by lipoprotein index. Veterinary, No. 7, р. 47-51. (In Russian).
15. Leeson S., & Summers J.D. (2005). Commercial Poultry Nutrition. 3rd ed. Guelph: University Books, ISBN 978-1-904761-78-5. 398 p.
16. Lukashenko, V. (2015). Methodology for Research in Egg and Poultry Meat Production Technology: Methodical Guide. Sergiev Posad, 103 p. ISBN: 978-5-98020-154-8. (In Russian).
17. Martynov, S. A. (2001). Efficiency of including untreated peat in the diets of farm animals. Chemistry and Computer Modeling. Butlerov Communications, Syktyvkar, no. 5. (In Russian).
18. Minitab user’s guide. Release 17 for Windows, Minitab LLC, 63p.
19. North M. O., & Bell D. D. (1990). Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 913 p. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691036
20. Pakhomova, A., Pakhomov, A., & Zelenkova, G. (2013). Innovative fodder production is the basis of the poultry subcomplex. Proceedings of the Orenburg State Agrarian University, No.1 (39), р.148-151. (In Russian).
21. Sidorenko, L. (2016). Biology of Chickens: A Study Guide. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University, 214 p. ISBN 978-5-00097-070-6. (In Russian).
22. Sklan, D. (2001). Development of the digestive tract of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 57(4), 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20010030
23. Uni, Z., Noy, Y., & Sklan, D. (1998). Posthatch development of small intestinal function in the chick. Poultry Science, 77(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.1.75
24. Uni, Z., Noy, Y., & Sklan, D. (2000). Development of the small intestine in heavy and light strain chicks before and after hatching. British Poultry Science, 41(4), р. 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/713654971
25. Uni, Z., Tako, E., Gal-Garber, O., & Sklan, D. (2003). Morphological, molecular, and functional changes in the chicken small intestine of the late-term embryo. Poultry Science, 82(11), р. 1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.11.1747
26. Zelenkova, G., & Gorlov, I. (2013). Fodder bentonite for farm animals and poultry (Ekobentokorm). Specifications TU 9283-199-10514645-13-2013, 8 p. (in Russian).
27. Zelenkova, G., & Pakhomov, A. (2010) The effectiveness of the use of mineral additives in poultry. Veterinary pathology, No. 4 (35), p. 36-39. (In Russian).
28. Zelenkova, G., & Pakhomov, A. (2012) Mineral and vitamin supplement in feeding replacement chickens. Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kuban State University, Krasnodar: KubGAU, No. 08 (82), р. 696-710. (In Russian).