Cultural heritage from the local to the universal in social studies teaching: A qualitative study on the case of Göbeklitepe
Öz
This study examines the place of Göbeklitepe in social studies education as a cultural heritage site that brings together local identity and universal heritage. The research was conducted using a basic qualitative design with 25 social studies teachers working in public middle schools in Malatya and Şanlıurfa during the 2025–2026 academic year. Maximum variation sampling was used to include teachers with different professional backgrounds, work locations, experiences of visiting Göbeklitepe, and experiences of teaching about the site. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that teachers associated local cultural heritage with continuity, belonging, social memory, educational value, and universal significance. They regarded Göbeklitepe both as an important part of the cultural identity of its region and as a heritage site with meaning for humanity as a whole. Teachers also stated that using Göbeklitepe in social studies lessons could support students’ historical consciousness, cultural identity, sense of belonging, and awareness of heritage protection. Although students were generally described as curious about Göbeklitepe, teachers believed that their knowledge was often limited and superficial. Participants also considered the coverage of Göbeklitepe and similar local heritage elements in the curriculum and textbooks insufficient. They especially emphasized the need for richer visuals, more activities, and stronger links with students’ everyday lives. Suggested practices included field trips, projects, drama, virtual tours, documentaries, museum activities, and ready-to-use teaching materials. The study shows that Göbeklitepe can provide a meaningful context for connecting local heritage with the wider human past in social studies education through active, experience-based, and context-sensitive learning opportunities.
Anahtar Kelimeler
social studies teaching, cultural heritage, local cultural heritage, historical consciousness, Göbeklitepe
Etik Beyan
Kaynakça
- Akhan, N. E. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler derslerinde somut olmayan kültürel miras öğretimi [Teaching intangible cultural heritage in social studies courses]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), pp. 722–736. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.03.017
- Andre, L., Durksen, T., & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: A decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), pp. 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9222-9
- Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, (65), pp. 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538
- Avcı, M., & Memişoğlu, H. (2016). Kültürel miras eğitimine ilişkin sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Views of social studies teachers about cultural heritage education]. İlköğretim Online, 15(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.58630
- Azrak, S., & Yalçınkaya, E. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin tarihi kültürel miras eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri (Denizli şehri örneği) [Social studies teachers’ views on historical cultural heritage education (The case of Denizli)]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), pp. 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3866
- Barghi, R., Zakaria, Z., Hamzah, A., & Hashim, N. H. (2017). Heritage education in the primary school standard curriculum of Malaysia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, pp. 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.012
- Batmaz, O., & Yurtbakan, E. (2023). İlkokul Türkçe, Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler ders kitaplarının kültürel miras unsurları açısından incelenmesi [An examination of primary school Turkish, Life Science, and Social Studies textbooks in terms of cultural heritage elements]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(1), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1115153
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (15th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
- Çengelci, T. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programında somut olmayan kültürel mirasın yeri [The place of intangible cultural heritage in the social studies curriculum]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), pp. 185–203.
- Demirezen, S., & Aktaş, G. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin somut olmayan kültürel miras öğretimine ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining social studies teachers’ views on teaching intangible cultural heritage]. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(30), pp. 413–434. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.699782 Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Routledge.
