Tourism Academic Journal

Tourism Academic Journal is a scientific peer-reviewed journal. The journal is tourism-focused and interdisciplinary. The main purpose of the journal is to publish papers that contribute to the tourism discipline theoretically and practically, were prepared within the framework of the neutrality principle, depend on science ethics and are solution-oriented. 

Tourism Academic Journal is an international and peer-reviewed journal that is published twice a year. It is a comprehensive platform where articles related to tourism can be published.

1. Tourism Academic Journal is a peer-review journal and being published one time in six months.

2. The manuscripts that will be submitted to the Tourism Academic Journal should not have been published or submitted to be published elsewhere.

3. The manuscripts that are sent to the Tourism Academic Journal are subject to editorial checks in terms of form and content. They are sent to the reviewers, if appropriate.

4. Research notes, research/book reviews, research/book criticisms, and academic opinions (with the approval and/or invitation by only the Editor in Chief) as well as research papers can be sent to the Tourism Academic Journal.

5. Please contact to the Editor in Chief and Assistant Editors if there is a problem in “submit paper” section.

6. Footnotes, graphs, and tables must be placed on the page where the reference is cited or right after. Notes under the graphs and tables must aim to make these material understandable without reading the main text.

7. Number of the figures and the tables must be maximum six. Table numbers and titles must be placed on the table, figure numbers and titles must be placed under the figures. The papers must be written in Microsoft Word. The font must be Times New Roman, font size must be 12, and page margins must be 3cm from the top, the bottom, the left, and the right. Paragraphs must start from 1cm inside. 6nk space must be left from the top and the bottom between the paragraphs. Titles of the tables and the graphs must be placed on the tables or graphs and written in the middle. Titles of the figures must be placed under the figures and written in the middle. The references of them must be written under the table with Times New Roman and font size must be 9. Items in the tables, graphs, and figures must be written with Times New Roman and font size must be 11. They should be numbered as 1, 2, 3,…. etc. First-order titles must be written uppercase and bold (INTRODUCTION, CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK), second-order and other subtitles must be written as first letters capital and bold.

8.  All the submissions must be written in Turkish or English. If the submission is research paper and in Turkish, an extended summary in English that contains 1200 words must provided with the manuscript. Also, the submissions must include 150-200-word abstract in Turkish and English, and title in English. The submissions must contain max. 7000 words excluding the extended abstract. The purpose, the methodology, the findings, and the conclusions must be expressed in the abstracts. There should be max four keywords both in Turkish and English. No abbreviation must be used in the abstracts.

9. There should be min. one max. three JEL codes (Journal of Economic Literature) that are in two-digit structure. JEL classification which should be selected based on the paper’s topic can be found on http://www.aeaweb.org/journal/jel_class_system.html JEL classification must be placed under the abstract.

10. The papers must be written in accordance with writing principles mentioned in the source “The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th Edition), 2010” published by American Psychological Association, APA.

11. Citations must contain the author’s surname and publication year (page number if necessary). For example; Üner (2006)...; Tuna (2007: 182)...; Yeşiltaş (2013: 182-186)...; According to Aktepe & Gürlek (2005)...; According to Kanten (2007)...; Tuna & Yeşiltaş (2014)...; Üner, Aktepe &Tuna (2004)... In accordance with APA citation format, if the reference has been written by three to five authors, all surnames must be provided in the first time it was cited in the text. When the same reference is cited, “et al.” must be used. If the number of authors is more than six, “et al.” must be used for the first citation and the rest of the citations. If there are more than one citation at the end of the sentences, these citations must be provided in alphabetical order. For example; (Aktepe, 2000; Tuna et al., 1996; Yeşiltaş, Kanten & Gürlek, 2007)…

12. The cited books, research articles, conference papers, dissertations, and technical notes must be provided in alphabetical order in the reference list.

13. The submissions must be structured with Introduction, Conceptual Framework, Findings (in empirical studies), and Conclusions. You may find a sample from http://dergipark.gov.tr/touraj/page/3685

In the reference list

The books;
Author’s Surname, first letter of his/her name, publication year, title, publisher, location must be provided.
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods (8th ed.), Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

Periodicals / Research Articles;

Author’s Surname, first letter of his/her name, publication year, title of the article, title of the journal, volume, issue, page numbers must be provided.

Tuna, M. & Yeşiltaş, M. (2014). Etik İklim, İşe Yabancılaşma ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otel İşletmelerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(1), 122-140.

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator– Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–1182.

Conference Papers;

Author’s Surname, first letter of his/her name, publication year, title of the paper, title of the conference, place of the conference must be provided.

Elçi, M., Ergün, E., Yılmaz, C. & Alpkan, L. (2004, 14- 18 July). Ethical Climate and Organizational Performance: Evidence from a Turkish Public Organization, Paper presented at the 13th. Annual World Business Congress of the International Management Development Association, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Dissertations;

Author’s Surname, first letter of his/her name, publication year, title of the dissertation, the name of the university, the place of the university must be provided.

Yeşiltaş, M. (2012). Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Belirleyicisi Olarak Etik Liderlik ve Etik İklim: Otel İşletmelerine Yönelik bir Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Internet Sources;

In the text: (Ministry of Culture and Tourism, 2015)
In the reference list: Ministry of Culture and Tourism. (2015, October 13). The list of hotels with tourism operation license. Retrieved from http://yigm.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,esisleri.html
In the text: (Tamer, 2015)
In the reference list: Tamer, M. (2015, 26 Haziran). E-ticaret hamle yapmak için tüketiciyi bekliyor. Milliyet. Retrieved from: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/ (Access on:…..)

14. The extended abstract must start from a new page right after the reference list and should four or five pages (A4) length. “Extensive Summary” must written at the top of the page, title of the article must be written right after it, and author names and institutes must be written in English. Correspondence author’s email address must be provided as footnote. The extended abstract must contain Introduction, Method, Findings, and Conclusion. There should be no other parts. The submissions in English does not need Extended Abstract. PS: Extended Abstract in English will not affect the number of the pages.

15. If the citations is made directly from the source, page number of the source must be provided.

16. The author(s) are responsible for the opinions mentioned in the text.

17. Translations are also published in Tourism Academic Journal. The approvals of the author(s) and publishers of the original text and publication place must be provided with the translated version.

18. Publication rights of printed and electronic versions of the manuscripts that are accepted and published belong to Tourism Academic Journal.

Publication Process
1. The submission are evaluated by the Editor in Chief or Assistant Editors. It can be sent back to the author(s) if necessary.

2. The review process is started for the submission that passes the initial check.

3. After deciding to start the review process, publication fee is requested from the author(s) and the author(s) are notified via email.

4. Publication fee is 200 Turkish Liras which covers the journal’s costs. According to Turkey Council of Higher Education’s decision made on 7 March 2019, this fee is requested without the condition of acceptance or rejection.

5. The manuscript is sent to two reviewers.

6. At the end of the review process, the submission that receives positive review from tow reviewers are accepted for the publication. Accepted manuscript is placed in order of publication with the Editor in Chief’s approval.

7. Revision might be requested from the author(s) if necessary. In this case, the revision must be completed in three weeks.

Tourism Academic Journal invites the authors to fulfill the following ethical conditions by believing in the contribution of developing a consistent and reputable information network. The journal pays attention to the instruction of the Higher Education Association Scientific Research and Publication Ethic, the suggestions of the ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors), and the international standards for the authors and the reviewers that are suggested by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). The job descriptions for the editors, the authors, and the reviewers have been prepared by following COPE (Code of Conduct for Journal Editors) and Elsevier Guidelines for Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.

Duties of Editors

Publication Decisions

The Editor in Chief is responsible for the manuscripts to decide which one(s) will be published. Validation and importance for the researchers and audience of the manuscript are sources for the decision. The Editor in Chief may discuss with the other editors or reviewer before making a decision. 

Peer Review

The Editor in Chief makes the evaluation process fair, objective, and on time. The research articles are reviewed by min. two independent reviewers from outside of the journal. The Editor in Chief may ask additional opinions if necessary. The Editor in Chief selects the experts in the field and avoids of selection of fraudulent and prejudicial reviewers.

Fair Play

The Editor in Chief evaluate the submissions in terms of intelletual content and regardless of author(s)’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious, ethnicity, citizenship or political view.

Confidentiality

Editor in Chief protects the confidentiality of the materials and the communications with the reviewers unless indicated otherwise. The Editor in Chief keeps the identity of the reviewers unless the reviewers accept to reveal their identity. The materials published in the research articles cannot be used by Editor in Chief without the auhtor(s)’ written permission. The information and opinions obtain during the review process keep in secret and are not used for personal advantage.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Editor in Chief must avoid to evaluate the submissions that contain conflicts from personal relationships. 

The Responsibilities of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer-review helps the Editor in Chief to make editorial decisions and may help the author(s) to improve the paper via editorial communications. Peer-review is placed in the center of the scientific management. The reviewers are asked to treat the author(s) and their papers as they want to be treated and to behave decorous. The reviewer who thinks him or herself is not qualified enough to review the submission or not possible to review it on time, has to inform the Editor in Chief and decline to be involved the review process. 

Confidentiality.

The all documents to be reviewed should be considered as top secret. The reviewers should not share the submission and the review with other people without the Editor in Chief’s permission or not communicate with the author(s) directly. The information and opinions obtain during the review process keep in secret and are not used for personal advantage.

Alertness to Ethical Issues.

The reviewer must be awake for the possible ethical issues and inform the Editor in Chief the mportant similarities with other research articles.

Standards of Objectivity
The reviews must be performed fair-and-square. The reviewers provide their opinions with supportive arguments.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

The author(s) must provide a correct explanation of the study as well as an objective discussion of the importance. The data should be presented correctly. Fraudulent and intentional misrepresentations are unethical behaviors and are not acceptable. 

Data Access and Retention.
The author(s) may be asked to provide the research data an / or obey the journal’s open data neccessities. They must be ready to provide the data for public access and be prepared to keep the data for acceptable duration after the publication.

Originality and Acknowledgement of Sources
The author(s) must be sure that they submit original papers and cite properly for other researchers’ studies or get necessary permissions. The author(s) must avoid from every types of plagiarism. 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication.

Submitting the paper to different journals at the same time is an unethical behavior and is not acceptable. Generally, the author(s) should not submit a study that was published elsewhere except for an abstract of a course or dissertation to another journal.

Authorship of the Paper

The authorship must be limited with the people who contributed to the concept, design, perform or explication of the study. Everyone who significantly contributed to the study must be listed as co-authors. The authors take the collective responsibility of the study. Each author is responsible to research and resolve of the all questions related to a part or whole of the study.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The role of all the financial sources and the supporter if exists in the study must be explained. Also, potential conflicts must be revealed as soon as possible.

Notification of Fundamental Errors

When the author finds an important mistake on the published paper, he/she immediately should inform the Editor in Chief or the publisher. It is the author’s responsibility to collaborate with the Editor in Chief to withdraw or revise the paper based on the Editor in Chief’s decision

Changes to Authorship

It is not acceptable to make change on the authorship list unless providing a clear explanation to the Editor in Chief. If any change is necessary, a clear explanation and written approval must be provided to the Editor in Chief.

Finally, Tourism Academic Journal wants to particularly remind the following issues to the author(s):

• Plagiarism, slicing, dublication, fabrication, ignoring the supports are among the unacceptable practices within the ethical framework. All the authors must be sensitive about these issues.
• The study should not be under review process of another journal.
• The study should not be published in elsewhere.
• The authors must avoid conflicts of interest among themselves.
• The submission should not contain information about the author(s).
• Tourism Academic Journal applies blind-review process. The authors must respect the confidentiality of the review process and must not reveal themselves to the reviewers.
• The responsibility of all the materials that are in the submission belongs to the authors.

Publication Policy
1. Tourism Academic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal and published one time in six months.This journal uses double-blind review.
2. The manuscripts submitted to the Tourism Academic Journal should not be published or submitted to elsewhere.
3. The manuscripts that are sent to the Tourism Academic Journal are subject to editorial checks in terms of form and content. They are sent to the reviewers, if appropriate.
4. The journal is tourism-focused and interdisciplinary. The main purpose of the journal is to publish papers that contribute to the tourism discipline theoretically and practically, were prepared within the framework of the neutrality principle, depend on science ethics and are solution-oriented.
5. The duration of a manuscript reviewing is 45 days on average.
The requested revisions must be performed based on the following instructions:
• Two separate files for the revisions must be prepared for manuscript and revision form. Both files should not contain author(s)’ information.
• The files must be named as “manuscript” and “revision form”.
• It should be explained how the revisions were performed on the form. The requested revision that is not possible to be applied should be explained in a valid and appropriate way.
•  Page, paragraph, and line numbers of the revisions must be provided on the form.
•  Revised parts must be written in red color on the text.
6. The authors must communicate with the Editor in Chief when they find a mistake. They should collaborate for revision or withdraw of the manuscript.

Dergi giderlerinin (dizgi vb.) karşılanması için yayın ücreti olarak 200 TL. ödenmesi gerekmektedir. Yükseköğretim Kurulu’nun 07.03.2019 tarihli Genel Kurulunda alınan karar gereği, bu bedel makalenin kabul/red şartına bağlı olmaksızın talep edilmektedir. Ücret detay yayıncılık banka hesabına yatırılmaktadır.