YAZIM KURALLARINA İLİŞKİN GENEL BİLGİLER

1.    Tüm çalışmalar Microsoft Word programında Times New Roman yazı karakterinde iki yana yaslı olacak şekilde yazılmalıdır.

2.   Çalışmanın Türkçe ve İngilizce başlığı kelimelerin BAŞ HARFLERİ BÜYÜK olacak biçimde 12 punto ve 1 satır aralığında olacak şekilde yazılmalıdır.

3.    Çalışmanın Öz/Abstract başlığı baş harfi büyük Times New Roman yazı karakterinde, bold ve 12 punto yazılmalıdır. Öz (Abstract) metni 9 punto ve 1 satır aralığında olmalı ve en fazla 300 kelime olacak şekilde yazılmalıdır.

4.  Yazar isim/isimleri çalışmanın başlığının altına bold ve 11 punto olacak biçimde sola yaslanarak sırasıyla yazılmalı ve akademik unvan kullanılmamalıdır. Yazarların kurumları isimlerinin altında sola yaslanarak sırasıyla yazılmalıdır. Yazarlara ait ORCID iD numaraları yazar bilgilerinin devamına eklenmelidir.

Örnek:

Kadir YILDIZ¹

¹ Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi,ORCID iD: 0000000065431234

5.    Çalışmanın anahtar kelimeleri (keywords) Öz (Abstract) metninin sağ tarafında örnek şablonda belirtildiği gibi hizalı şekilde 9 punto olmalı ve büyük harfle başlamalı, italik yazı karakterinde ve 3 ile 5 kelime olarak yazılmalıdır.

6.   Çalışmanın sorumlu yazarına ilişkin Yazışma adresi, e-posta ve telefon bilgileri, Öz/Abstract bilgilerinin alt kısmında 9 punto ile dipnot olarak verilmelidir.

7.    Çalışmanın metin kısmı 12 punto ile 1,15 satır aralığında yazılmalıdır.

8.   Tablo, grafikler, şekiller vb. görsellerin yazı karakteri 10 punto (9-11 punto) olmalı ve APA 6 stiline göre hazırlanmalıdır. Bilimsel araştırmalarda yer alacak tablo, grafik ve şekiller özenle seçilmelidir. Metin içerisinde özetlenebilecek bilgiler için ayrıca tabloya yer verilmemelidir.

Tablo 1: Model uyum kriterleri ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uyum değerleri (Başlıkta sadece ilk kelimenin baş harfi büyük olmalıdır)

9.      Çalışma: GİRİŞ, YÖNTEM (Araştırmanın Modeli, Çalışma grubu/Araştırma Grubu/Evren- Örneklem, Veri Toplama Araçları, Verilerin Toplanması, Verilerin Analizi), BULGULAR, TARTIŞMA, SONUÇ, ÖNERİLER ve KAYNAKLAR şeklinde düzenlenmelidir ve her bölüm başlığı bold, BÜYÜK harf ve 12 punto olmalıdır.

10.     Çalışma, A4 sayfası formatında olmalı, metin uzunluğu şekil, grafik ve tablolar dâhil 20-25 sayfayı geçmemelidir.

11.     Sayfa düzeni yapılırken her kenardan 2.5 cm boşluk bırakılmalıdır.

12.     Sayfa numaraları sayfanın altında ve ortada Times New Roman karakterinde 11 punto olmalıdır (İlk sayfada sayfa numarası görünmemeli).

                                                                     KAYNAK GÖSTERİMLERİ

13.     Kaynaklar bölümü yeni bir sayfadan başlamalıdır.

14.    Metin içi kaynak gösteriminde birden fazla eserler, alfabetik sıra ile verilmelidir. Aynı parantezde iki veya daha fazla çalışmanın gösteriminde, çalışma aralarına noktalı virgül işareti konulur (Hutchins ve Rowe, 2009: 120-125; Yıldız, 2016; Yıldız ve Güzel, 2015: 12-25). İngilizce çalışmalar için ise; (Hutchins & Rowe, 2009: 120-125).

15.     Kaynaklar listesi, her bir çalışmanın ilk yazarın soyadının baş harfine göre alfabetik olarak sıralanır.

16.     Kaynakça da kaynak gösterimi:

Kaynaklar metni 10 punto ve 1 satır aralığında APA stiline göre yazılmalıdır. Kaynak yazımlarında dergi yazım kuralları ve Örnek şablon göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

İlk göndermede:

         Metin içi kaynak gösterimlerinde;

Tek yazarlı:

Yıldız’a (2017) göre …

(Yıldız, 2017)

İki ve/veya daha fazla yazarlı çalışmalar:

Yıldız ve Özsoy’a (2017) göre

(Yıldız ve Özsoy, 2017)

Yazar sayısı Üç ile beş arasında ise; ilk geçtiği yerde (Yıldız, Dirik ve Özsoy, 2017) şeklinde; ikinci geçtiği yer itibariyle, Yıldız ve diğerleri (2017) veya (Yıldız vd., 2017) şeklinde gösterilmelidir.

İngilizce yazılan makalelerde üç, dört ya da beş yazarlı yayınlara gönderme yapılırken ve arkadaşları yerine et al. ifadesi kullanılmalıdır.

*Metin içi ilk gösterimde : (Yıldız, Dirik ve Özsoy, 2017)

*Metin içi sonraki gösterimlerde: (Yıldız ve et al., 2017)

Yazar sayısı Altı ve daha fazla yazarı olan çalışmalara gönderme yapılırken ilk geçtiği yerden itibaren sadece ilk yazarın soyadı belirtilir:

Metin içi ilk geçtiği yerden itibaren: Yıldız ve diğerleri (2017) veya (Yıldız vd., 2017)

*** Metin içi DOĞRUDAN ALINTILAR da sayfa numarası gösterilmesi zorunludur.

Metin içi gösterimde : “……………………………..” (Yıldız, Dirik ve Özsoy, 2017:21)

Dergiden alınmış ise:

Tek yazarlı

Özsoy, S. (2014). Türkiye'deki spor basınında nefret söylemi. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 46-60. Varsa DOI: 10.25307/jssr.328103 yoksa İnternet erişimi

İki yazarlı çalışmalar:

Özsoy, S. ve Yıldız, K. (2014). Türkiye'deki spor basınında nefret söylemi. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2), 46-60. Varsa DOI: 10.25307/jssr.328103 yoksa İnternet erişimi

Üç ve daha fazla yazarlı çalışmalar:

Yousefi, Z., Abedi, M., Baghban, I., Eatemadi, O. & Abedi, A. (2011). Personal and situational variables, and career concerns: Predicting career adaptability in young adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 263-271. Varsa DOI: 10.25307/jssr.328103 yoksa İnternet erişimi

Kitaptan alınmış ise:

              Tek yazarlı

Yıldız, K. (2016). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri boyutuyla, spor ve iletişim. Ankara: Nobel.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. baskı). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum As­sociates.

İki yazarlı çalışmalar:

Akyıldız Munusturlar, M., ve Argan, M. (2014). Ciddi ve kayıtsız boş zaman katılımcılarının kişilik özellikleri ile boş zaman tatmini ve yaşam tatmini arasındaki ilişki. Ankara: Nobel.

Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

Packianathan, C., & Alberto, M. (2006). Human resource management in Olympic sport organizations. USA: MEMOS.

Üç ve daha fazla yazarlı çalışmalar: 

Dougherty, M., Meyer, E.T., Madsen, C., Van den Heuvel, C., Thomas, A., & Wyatt, S. (2010). Researcher engagement with web archives: State of the Art. Report. London: JISC. Erişim adresi: http://ierepository.jisc.ac.uk/544/

NOT: İngilizce yazılan makalelerde iki veya daha fazla yazarlı yayınlara gönderme yapılırken ve bağlacına karşılık olarak and bağlacı ya da & işareti kullanılır. Sadece yıl bilgisinin parantez içinde yer aldığı metin içi göndermelerde and, soyad ve yıl bilgisinin birlikte parantez içinde yer aldığı metin içi göndermelerde ise & işareti kullanılır.

Yıldız and Parker (2017)

(Yıldız & Parker, 2017)

İngilizce çalışmalarda Türkçe bir kaynağa gönderme yapılıyorsa ve yerine and ifadesi, Türkçe bir çalışmada İngilizce bir kaynağa gönderme yapılıyorsa and yerine ve ifadesi kullanılmalıdır.

Türkçe bir çalışmada İngilizce bir kaynak kullanımı

Nielsen, B. G., ve Borlund, P. (2011). Information literacy, learning, and the public library: A study of Danish high school students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 43, 106-119. Doi:10.1177/0961000611408643

 Metin içi 

Gönderme

(Nielsen ve Borlund, 2011: 110)

(Nielsen ve Borlund, 2011)

Editörlü Kitaptan alınmış ise:

Uztuğ, F. (2003). İletişim engel ve etmenleri. U. Demiray (Ed.), Meslek Yüksekokulları için Genel İletişim içinde(188-196). Ankara: Pegem.

Anonim ise:

Anonim. (2000). Sporcu İstatistikleri, T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, Ankara: Yayın No:180.

Bildiriler:

Akkoyunlu, B. (2007). Öğrenme stilleri. Y. Tonta (Ed.), Bilgi Yönetimi Ulusal Sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı içinde (ss. 51-71). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

Tezler:

Yıldız, K. (2015). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin örgüt içi iletişime etkisi: Türkiye Oryantiring Federasyonu Örneği. Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Spor yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Bolu.

ELEKTRONIK KAYNAKLAR:

Bir Web Sitesinde Belirli Bir Sayfa

Spray, C.M, Wang C.K.J, Biddle, S.J.M & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2006). Understanding motivation in sport: An experimental test of achievement goal and self determination theories. European Journal of Sport Science, 6(1): 43-51. [Available online at: http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2006_SprayWangBiddleChat_EJSS%20(1). pdf], Erişim tarihi: 30 Ağustos 2007.

İnternet ortamında alınmış ise:

Gökçe, D. (2016). FIFA namuslu düzene geçiyor. 02.12.2016, http://www.futbolekonomi.com/index.php/haberler-makaleler/genel/188-deniz- gokce/4042-fifa.html şeklinde verilmelidir.

Dergide Basılan ve İnternette Yayınlanan Elektronik Dergilerden Alınan Makaleler

Yüksel, A., ve Yüksel, A. (2013). Bankacılık sektörü hisse senedi endeksi ile enflasyon arasındaki ilişki: yedi ülke örneği, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 20(2), 37-50, [Available online at: http://www2.bayar.edu.tr/yonetimekonomi/dergi/pdf/C20S22013/37-50.pdf], Erişim tarihi: 4 Ocak 2014.

17.      Aynı yazarın aynı tarihli birden fazla çalışması olduğunda, kaynakça ile paralel bir şekilde “a, b, c” gibi küçük harflerle sıralanır.

(Özsoy, 2016a)

(Özsoy, 2016b)

(Özsoy, 2016c)

Ethical Principles and Publishing Policy
Publication Ethics

Journal of Sport Sciences Researches aims to produce, improve, and share knowledge objectively via scientific methods by examining the current improvements related to Sport Sciences with a holistic and inclusive approach.
Scientific works are studies which are concluded as a result of scientific methods and which provide with the application of scientific methods and objectivity. In the process of production of these works, all the components of the publication process; namely, publisher, editor, author, reviewers, and readers must follow the ethical principles. In this scope, Journal of Sport Sciences Researches must also follow the ethical principles of the all components of the publication process in the light of the guides and policies published in the open access by the Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE (e.g. COPE “Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors”; ICMJE Recommendations, CSE White Paper on Publication Ethics, WAME resources, WMA policies, and ORI; WMA Helsinki Declaration).
In case manipulated, falsified and fabricated data is determined in the scientific studies which are sent and/or accepted by the journal, the institution(s) for which the author(s) works for will be informed and the study will be rejected. Journal of Sport Sciences Researches has the right to ask for the documents related to the analysis results from the authors according to the feedback given by the editorial board and/or reviewers.

Research Ethics (ETHICAL CONSENT FORM)
In the scope of the protection of human and animal rights, the Journal of Sport Sciences Researches adopts the exact convenience principle of national and international ethical rules and principles. In the articles evaluated in Journal of Sport Sciences Researches, Research Ethics Committee Approval is needed for the following items:
• Researches conducted in qualitative or quantitative approaches which require data collection from the participants using survey, interview, focus group study, observation, and/or experiment techniques,
• Using humans or animals (including material/data) with experimental or other scientific aims,
• Clinical researches on humans,
• Researches on animals,
• Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Publisher
Journal of Sport Sciences Researches is a personal journal having been publishing in the field of Sport Sciences with the management of publication board or editorial board since 2016. The journal publishers adopt the principle of free publishing without profit making purposes in the light of publishing scientific studies with ethical principles.
• The publisher who is one of the stakeholders of the scientific study must act in the light of ethical principles.
• The publisher is responsible for using the communication ability without considering personal benefits and for leading the audience correctly.
• The publisher protects all the property rights and copyrights of the articles published in their journal; and assumes the task of archiving each product.
• Individuals must not abstain from contacting the publisher in case they come across an unethical situation.

Ethical Tasks and Responsibilities of the Editors
• Rejecting articles which are incompatible with the aim and scope of the journal.
• Considering the original value of the articles, their contribution to the field, the reliability and validity of the research method, the clarity of expression and the aim and scope of the journal.
• Evaluating the articles in the pre-assessment phase as long as there are no serious problems about the submitted articles; considering the suggestions of the Reviewers, not changing the decisions made by previous editor(s) as long as there are no serious problems, providing with constructive criticism.
• Applying double-blind peer review method and evaluation process policies adopted by the journal, keep the identity information of the reviewers confidential, providing with objective and timely evaluation for each article.
• In order to provide with independent peer evaluation,
• In order to achieve peer evaluation independently, reviewers independent from the institutions of the authors are appointed.
• Sending articles for evaluation to the editors and reviewers considering their field of expertise and supporting objective and independent evaluation process.
• Acting in a balanced objective and fair way while the reviewers and editors do their duty without letting any discriminations against gender, religion or political belief or the ethnic or geographical roots of the authors.
• Evaluating the articles according to their content and favoring no authors in that sense.
• Taking necessary precautions and evaluating the presented declarations if any; in order to prevent possible conflicts of interest. In case there is a conflict of interest, Journal suspends the evaluation process of the article until the ambiguity is resolved; in this sense, Journal has the right to demand Research Ethics Committee Approval, Interviewer Consent Forms, and required documents.
• Evaluating sponsored articles or articles on special subjects in the same way with other articles.
• Applying required procedures by adhering to the policies and procedures of the journal in case there is a complaint about the ethical violation. Giving a chance to the authors in order to answer the complaint, and not avoiding applying required sanctions no matter to whom the article belongs to.
• Taking articles with negative conclusions into account.
• Acting responsibly and sensitively about publishing contents such as notice of correction, explanation, apology, and disclaimer.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Reviewers
A double-blind peer review is applied in the process of article evaluation in the Journal of Sport Sciences Researches in which author(s) do not know reviewers and vice versa; Reviewers do not contact with authors directly; correction requests are forwarded to author(s) by the editors on the journal management system through article evaluation forms and notes on the original text.
Reviewers who are to evaluate articles submitted to Journal of Sport Sciences Researches must carry the following ethical responsibilities:
• Reviewers must objectively evaluate only the content of the article in a timely manner and must accept articles only about their fields of expertise in order to contribute to the decision-making process of the Editor.
• Reviewers must carry out the evaluation objectively and in strict confidence. As per this principle, they must remove the articles that they have evaluated and must use them after they are published. Nationality, gender, religion, political belief and commercial purposes must not be included in the evaluation process and must not ruin the objectivity.
• When reviewers conclude that there is a conflict of interest – common interest, they must inform the editor and reject evaluating the article.
• Reviewers must conclude evaluation in accordance with the academic etiquette with a constructive and kind use of language; and must avoid libelous and hostile personal comments.
• Reviewers must evaluate the article which they accept to evaluate in the given time.
• Reviewers must reject evaluating articles which resemble to their own article in the writing process or in the evaluation process.
• Reviewers must protect the confidentiality of the information provided by the editor and author; as per confidentiality policy, they must remove the article after evaluation; if any, they must inform the editor about situations against bling judgment policy and reject the offer of evaluation.
• They must be aware of the potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative or author-related or the relations among authors); and if necessary, they must warn the editor.
• They must continue to protect the confidentiality of the study and the evaluation process.
• In case there is a situation which can affect their original comments and feedbacks, they must inform the journal.
• They must try to reply to the demands coming from the journal about revision and re-evaluation.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Authors
The following are the scientific research ethical responsibilities of author(s) who submitted article to Journal of Sport Sciences Researches:
• Author(s) must not submit their articles to Journal of Sport Sciences Researches at if the article was published in another journal or was submitted to another journal.
• Author(s) must send original articles to Journal of Sport Sciences Research.
• Author(s) must refer to the sources that they use during the production of the article appropriately in the light of ethical principles.
• The individuals who does not contribute to the article must not be included in the article as author(s); changing the author order of the article or adding new authors or excluding an author must not be offered after submitting the article. During submission, the names of the authors must be uploaded to the system by the correspondent author. The Journal Editor Committee do not make any changes on the system.
• Author(s) must inform the editor about the individuals with conflict of interest or common interests for the article that has been submitted.
• In case information about the article or raw data is requested from the authors during the evaluation process, the requested information must be provided by the author(s) to the editor.
• Author(s) must provide documents related to the rights to use data, the approvals related to the research-analyses or the consents of the participant who forms the study groups. Information concerning voluntary participation consent form must be provided in the method part.
• Author(s) must contact the editors and edit or retrieve their content within five days when they realize that there is a problem with their article in the process of evaluation or in the preview process or published in the journal’s electronic environment.
• Author(s) must provide information regarding ethics committee approval of their articles which require quantitative or qualitative data collection such as experiment, survey, scale, interview, observation, focus group study with the name of the ethics committee name, decision date and issue in the first and last pages and in the method part. They must also submit an ethics committee approval document to the system.
• Author(s) must provide evidence (obtaining permission for the use of documents such as scales, surveys and photographs developed by others) that show they pay strict attention to the ethical principles in the process of data collection in the article. In the articles, it must be pointed out that copyright regulations were applied for the research and publication ethics and literary and artistic works. If the research is on humans and animals, it must be pointed out that the research was conducted in accordance with the international declarations, guides etc. (Helsinki Declaration).
• No ethics committee approval is required for the review articles. However, authors must show that there is no requirement for ethics committee requirement in the first, the last and the method part for the articles without ethics committee requirements.

Plagiarism Policy
Plagiarism is a common and serious ethical problem which affects the scientific studies without considering if it is deliberate or not. Consequently, it is unethical and unacceptable as well as it is a crime to publish articles which have similarities with other sources and do not include references for it.
Journal of Sport Sciences Researches takes various precautions to prevent any kind of plagiarism. Similarity Report Programs are used in order to determine the coinciding and similar text examples of the articles (after the acceptance of the articles). Articles with similarity score of 10% and more are rejected even though they are accepted in the first place. Moreover, publication board can act in accordance with COPE rules when encountered by plagiarism, reference manipulation and data fraud claims and suspicions.

Conflict of Interest Policy and Copyright Regulation
• Journal of Sport Sciences Researches is responsible for taking precautions in order to prevent potential conflicts of interest and for assessing the given declarations. Consequently, the journal thinks that potential conflicts of interest harms the scientific publication ethics. The journal defines all the responsibilities for all shareholders in order to determine and prevent conflicts of interest. In case of a potential conflict of interest, the Journal suspends the evaluation process of an article until the unclarity is eliminated. In this context, the Journal has the right to request Ethics Committee Approval, Interviewer Voluntary Consent Form and other documents to be submitted from the author that submits the article.
• Author(s) has the copyright of their own articles and the first-time publication right belongs to the Journal of Sport Sciences Researches; as per Creative Commons Attribution principles, the article can be shared referring to the author and journal.
• Author(s) must submit the article with the signed version of Copyright and Conflict of Interest Form (all the authors of an article must sign it) when they apply for article publication to Journal of Sport Sciences Researches.

Publication Fee
Journal of Sport Sciences Researches do not demand any charges for publication or publication cost from the author or the authors in any phase such as the submission, evaluation publication phases. Furthermore, no article processing charges are requested from the authors for their submitted articles. The journal is free-of-charge and 100% nonprofit in order to support publication in the field of Sport Sciences. Moreover, the journal provides with DOI number from the moment the article is accepted and provides free access to the full text of the article.


Preview
The articles which are submitted to the Journal of Sport Sciences Researches, accepted after the evaluation process and completed the process after the acceptance are presented with preview along with their DOI (Digital Object Identifier) numbers on the electronic environment in order to distribute the scientific information in an up-to-date manner. The articles which are published in the preview are published in an issue and voice with a page number approved by the editor board and they are removed from the preview afterward. The articles in preview may not be the last version which will be published in the intended issue. Small changes may occur in the last version of the studies.

Reporting Situations Against Ethical Principles to the Journal Editor Board
In the Journal of Sport Sciences Researches, editors, reviewers, authors must report the situations against Ethical Principles about the behaviors or the articles which are in the evaluation process, in preview or published using sporbilimleriarastirmalari@gmail.com.

Policy Grounds

YÖK Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi (Boar of Higher Education Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directions)
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Budapest Open Access Initiative
Creative Commons