Araştırma Makalesi

Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study

Cilt: 14 21 Eylül 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study

Öz

Assessment and evaluation in distance education aim to ensure that learning outcomes are determined in a valid, reliable, and fair manner. While the flexibility in time and place offered by distance education allows for diversity in assessment and evaluation, problems such as academic integrity and technical issues, which undermine both validity and reliability, prevent the assessment from being conducted healthily. This research aims to investigate how an effective assessment process can be maintained in distance education. For this purpose, data were collected through Delphi rounds. Consensus was reached on the assessment and evaluation process in distance education through 3 rounds and 1 intermediate round, based on the expert panelists' opinions. As a result of the research findings, it was revealed that this process should be considered as a system. The sub-steps of this system include planning, measurement, and evaluation tools and environments, validity and reliability, protection of personal data, and support.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Distance education, measurement, evaluation, Delphi research

Etik Beyan

Ethical Committee Permission Information Name of the board that carries out ethical assessment: Gazi University Ethics Board. The date and number of the ethical assessment decision: 03.08.2021 E-77082166-302.08.01-161201.

Teşekkür

This study was derived from my doctoral dissertation. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my esteemed thesis advisor and jury members for their academic guidance and valuable contributions throughout my doctoral process. I also extend my heartfelt thanks to the distinguished panelists who generously devoted their time and effort during the data collection phase.

Kaynakça

  1. Adıgüzel, A. (2020). Salgın sürecinde uzaktan eğitim ve öğrenci başarısını değerlendirmeye ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on the evaluation of student achievement in distance education during the pandemic]. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 49, 253–271.
  2. Agtarap, H. J., Januto, A. C., Aglibot, K. A., & Toquero, C. M. (2024). Assessment strategies and challenges of teachers in evaluating students during online learning. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(2), ep2418. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14863
  3. Almeida, F., & Monteiro, J. (2021). The challenges of assessing and evaluating students at a distance. Journal of Online Higher Education, 5(1), 3–10.
  4. Arnold, I. J. (2016). Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off? The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.001
  5. Altan, T., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2009). Uzaktan eğitimde değerlendirme süreci: Öğrenci görüşlerinin sistemin gelişimine katkıları [The assessment process in distance education: Contributions of students' views to the improvement of the system]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, Trabzon, Türkiye, 861–865
  6. Bakioğlu, A., & Can, E. (2011, May 27–29). Açıköğretimde ölçme ve değerlendirme: Problemler ve öneriler [Assessment and evaluation in open education: Problems and recommendations]. Proceedings of the International Higher Education Congress: New Trends and Issues (UYK-2011), İstanbul, Türkiye
  7. Balta, Y., & Türel, Y. K. (2013). An examination of various assessment and evaluation methods used in online distance education. Turkish Studies – International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(3), 37–45.
  8. Bearman, M., Nieminen, J. H., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing assessment in a digital world: Anorganising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 291–304.
  9. Bennett, G., & Green, F. P. (2001). Promoting service learning via online instruction. College Student Journal, 491–497.
  10. Benson, R., & Brack, C. (2010). Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide. Chandos.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Su Tonga, E., & Şahin, S. (2026). Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1891578
AMA
1.Su Tonga E, Şahin S. Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1891578
Chicago
Su Tonga, Emine, ve Sami Şahin. 2026. “Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (Eylül). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1891578.
EndNote
Su Tonga E, Şahin S (01 Eylül 2026) Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14
IEEE
[1]E. Su Tonga ve S. Şahin, “Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study”, JCER, c. 14, Eyl. 2026, doi: 10.18009/jcer.1891578.
ISNAD
Su Tonga, Emine - Şahin, Sami. “Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (01 Eylül 2026). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1891578.
JAMA
1.Su Tonga E, Şahin S. Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1891578.
MLA
Su Tonga, Emine, ve Sami Şahin. “Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, c. 14, Eylül 2026, doi:10.18009/jcer.1891578.
Vancouver
1.Emine Su Tonga, Sami Şahin. Assessment Processes in Distance Education: A Delphi Study. JCER. 01 Eylül 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1891578