Araştırma Makalesi

Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?

Cilt: 14 7 Haziran 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?

Öz

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of Quantum Learning and Applied Learning activities on academic achievement, attitudes, motivation, and learning retention in science education. The present study employed a pre-test-post-test control group quasi-experimental design, with a total of 97 fourth-grade students participating in two experimental groups and one control group. During the eight-week process, Quantum Learning activities were implemented in Experimental Group 1, Applied Learning activities in Experimental Group 2, and the current curriculum was continued in the control group. The data were collected using achievement tests, attitude, and motivation scales. Two-factor ANOVA and MANOVA were used in the analysis. The findings indicated that Applied Learning exhibited superior efficacy in comparison to Quantum Learning with respect to academic achievement, attitude, motivation, and enduring learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Achievement, attitude, hands-on learning, motivation, quantum learning

Etik Beyan

Since the data of this study were collected before March 2020, there is no ethics committee approval.

Kaynakça

  1. Acat, M. B. & Ay, Y. (2014). An investigation the effect of quantum learning approach on primary school 7th grade students’ science achievement, retention and attitude. Educational Research Association the International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 5(2), 11-23.
  2. Akgün, Ş. (2000). Making simple lesson materials using environmental resources. PegemA.
  3. Arı, E. & Alaca, Ö. (2015). The effects of the quantum learning model on success, attitude and retention in the science course and its evaluation by students. Asian Journal of Teaching, 3(1), 30-49.
  4. Ateş, Ö., & Eryılmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and attitudes towards physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1-22.
  5. Barlas, L. (2002). Quantum learning effects on student attitudes toward learning and academic achievement. (Master’s Thesis). University of Aurora.
  6. Çakır, C. (2013). Quantum learning model-based teaching of the structure and properties of matter unit at the 8th grade level of elementary education. (Master's Thesis). Balıkesir University.
  7. DeLisi, J., Kook, J. F., Levy, A. J., Fields, E., & Winfield, L. (2021). An examination of the features of science fairs that support students’ understandings of science and engineering practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 491–519.
  8. DePorter, B., Reardon M., & Nourie, S. S. (1999). Quantum teaching: Orchestrating student success. Allyn and Bacon a Viacom Company.
  9. Erdem-Özcan, G., & Uyanık, G. (2022). The effects of the “predict-observe-explain (POE)” strategy on academic achievement, attitude and retention in science learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research 6(3), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202215535
  10. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate study in education. (6th Edition). McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Uyanık, G. (2026). Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education? Journal of Computer and Education Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1807895
AMA
1.Uyanık G. Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education? JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1807895
Chicago
Uyanık, Gökhan. 2026. “Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (Haziran). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1807895.
EndNote
Uyanık G (01 Haziran 2026) Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education? Journal of Computer and Education Research 14
IEEE
[1]G. Uyanık, “Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?”, JCER, c. 14, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.18009/jcer.1807895.
ISNAD
Uyanık, Gökhan. “Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (01 Haziran 2026). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1807895.
JAMA
1.Uyanık G. Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education? JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1807895.
MLA
Uyanık, Gökhan. “Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, c. 14, Haziran 2026, doi:10.18009/jcer.1807895.
Vancouver
1.Gökhan Uyanık. Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education? JCER. 01 Haziran 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1807895