ISTJ Ethical Principles
Istanbul Education Journal (ISTJ) Ethical Principles are written to create quality scientific publications, ethical standards and trust in scientific knowledge for authors, reviewers, publishers and readers.
Ethical Principles and Responsibilities for the ISTJ Authors
Authors who submit articles to
ISTJ are expected to comply with the following ethical principles and responsibilities:
1.All the article data submitted by authors to
ISTJ for review must be accurate and original.
2.Authors must fully and accurately cite their references in the article. All the responsibility for similarity belongs to the authors. Authors must know the rules of citation and comply with these rules
(see APA 7 reference indication). Even if the similarity rate is 1%, plagiarism may occur if the authors do not obey the citation rules. Therefore, citation rules must be known by authors and applied carefully. If any plagiarism is detected, the article will be rejected.
ISTJ reserves the right to apply additional sanctions for plagiarized authors and articles.
3.The article submitted to
ISTJ for the publication must not have been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
4.Since authors cannot submit their articles to more than one journal's application process at the same time, each application must be started after the previous one is completed.
5.The studies previously presented at congresses and symposiums and only the published abstract may be accepted to
ISTJ, provided that this is stated.
6.If the article is presented as part of a master's thesis, doctoral thesis, or other comprehensive research projects, the title of the relevant thesis/research/project must also be stated.
7.Authors must clearly state which functions of the artificial intelligence tools they have used in their studies, at which research stages and to what extent, both in the ethical statement section of their articles and in
the ISTJ Ethical Statement Form. They must detail the versions and technical specifications of their artificial intelligence software.
8.When authors are requested to provide raw data regarding their articles within the review process, the relevant data must be forwarded to editors or referees.
9.Authors cannot withdraw their articles that have been successfully peer-reviewed and queued for publication without a valid excuse.
10.Authors must give feedback for corrections or stating any objections to the corrections, if any, within the time period specified for them. Authors who do not comply with the time period specified for them may be granted a one-time additional period as deemed appropriate by the relevant editor, and if the author does not complete the necessary corrections within this additional period, the article may be returned to the author or rejected outright.
11.No copyright is paid to the article sent to
ISTJ. The copyright of the published article belong to the author. Authors authorize
ISTJ to publish the article and identify it as the original publisher. Authors grant any third party the right to freely use the article if original authors and citation details are identified.
The signed ISTJ Copyright Agreement Form must be added to
the ISTJ process file. Click for the ISTJ Copyright Agreement Form.
12.In ethical statement section, authors must state that they have complied with all ethical rules while conducting the study. The
signed ISTJ Ethical Stament Form must be added to
the ISTJ process file. Click for the ISTJ Ethical Statement Form.
13.
Ethics committee approval must be obtained for the articles that require it. This
ethical approval must be stated on the relevant page of the article, and the ethics committee approval document must be added to
the ISTJ process file along with the article. If the ethics committee approval is not required for the article, the reason for this must be clearly stated in this section. In addition, the author must sign
the ISTJ Declaration of No Need for Ethics Committee Approval Form, which confirms that the article does not require the ethics committee approval.
Click for the ISTJ Statement of No Need for Ethics Committee Approval Form.14.In conflict of interest section, authors must state that they do not have any conflict of interest among themselves and that no situation affects their objectivity for or against any person or institution. The
signed ISTJ Conflict of Interest Statement Form must be added to
the ISTJ process file. Click for the ISTJ Conflict of Interest Statement Form.15.In studies with more than one author, authors must transparently state the extent of their support for the article. Contributing to the conception, design, analysis and interpretation of the article; providing support to the article not only in terms of spelling and grammar, but also in terms of intellectual and academic content, and finalizing the article before sending it for review are prerequisites that an author must fulfill in order to be written as an author of the article. The names of those who do not meet one or more of these conditions must not be written as authors in the article. Individuals or institutions that provided technical support, data collection assistance, or funding to the study, but who do not fully meet the authorship criteria, may be included in the "Acknowledgements" section. The
signed Author Contribution Statement Form must be added to
the ISTJ process file. Click for the ISTJ Author Contribution Statement Form.16.Violations of Publication Ethics
Duplicate Publication: Publishing the same or largely similar study in more than one journal.
Salami Slicing: Publishing a comprehensive study by artificially dividing it into multiple smaller articles.
Simultaneous Submission: Sending the same article to more than one journal for reviewing at the same time.
Fabrication: Producing and reporting non-existent data or results.
Falsification: Manipulating research materials or processes or distorting the research record by changing or omitting research data or results.
Direct Plagiarism: Copying text or expressions from another author's article word for word and using them without citing the source.
Patchwriting: Taking a specific section or expression from another article, making minor changes, and presenting it as one's own work.
Mosaic Plagiarism: Combining sentences or expressions from different sources and presenting them as an original text.
Misattribution: Giving a false or fake source to a quote or information from a study.
Failure to Cite: Failure to properly cite or reference the source when using data, ideas, methods, or results from another study.
Authors must confirm that their submitted articles do not contain such ethical violations.
Ethical Principles and Responsibilities for the ISTJ Editor-in-Chief(EIC), the ISTJ Assistant Editor,
the ISTJ Copy Editors and the ISTJ Subject Editors
The ISTJ EIC, the ISTJ Assistant Editor, the ISTJ Copy Editors and
the ISTJ Subject Editors working for
ISTJ are expected to comply with the following ethical principles and responsibilities:
1.
The ISTJ EIC, the ISTJ Assistant Editor, the ISTJ Copy Editors and the ISTJ Subject Editors are responsible for creating a quality journal for teachers, principals, and researchers to publish their academic studies and making
ISTJ a journal indexed in the national and international directories.
2.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC have authority to decide whether an article can be sent to referees and referees to be assigned to the article.
3.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC are responsible for the content of the article. When necessary, they can publish a correction note or perform a retraction.
4.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC are responsible for maintaining and completing the peer-review process by scientific criteria and ethical principles.
5.The ISTJ EIC, the ISTJ Assistant Editor and the ISTJ Subject Editors are responsible for fulfilling the requirements of the double-blind referee model.
6.The ISTJ Editor, the ISTJ Assistant Editor, the ISTJ Copy Editors and the ISTJ Subject Editors ensure the confidentiality of an article until it is published; this does not apply to the applications made to more than one place at the same time.
7.
The ISTJ Copy Editors assess whether an article submitted to
ISTJ adheres to the prescribed format and style outlined in
the ISTJ Article Writing Template. In the event of non-compliance,
the ISTJ Copy Editors identify and highlight the discrepancies, requesting the author to rectify the deficiencies and errors.
8.The ISTJ Subject Editors are appointed by the ISTJ EIC in accordance with their areas of expertise while the article is undergoing preliminary review, prior to the article being sent to referees. It is incumbent upon the ISTJ Subject Editors to possess the requisite competencies to ensure the quality and integrity of the article in question. It is the responsibility of the ISTJ Subject Editors to ensure that authors and their articles adhere to the established scientific and ethical standards. The Subject Editors make a decision regarding the article in question, basing their judgement on the original value of the article, the aims of the journal in question and the ethical rules that pertain to the field of study.
9.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors have the authority not to publish the article that does not comply with the publication conditions, to return it to the author for correction, or to edit it in format.
10.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC check whether authors have made the corrections requested by editors and referees in an article. In case of corrections not made on time, authors may be given additional time or may return the article to authors.
11.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC accept, reject or request changes to the article in line with the referee reports.
12.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC inform referees that an article is confidential and that this is a privileged interaction.
13.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC do not allow any conflict of interest among editors, authors and referees.
14.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC may appoint a third referee to review an article. In this case, the ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC may reject the article, give a minor or major revision, or mark the acceptance decision, depending on the third referee's review.
15.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Subject Editors appointed by the ISTJ EIC send the article, which has the approval of referees, to the ISTJ Language Editors to be examined for semantic integrity, spelling rules, and punctuation marks.
16.After the ISTJ Language Editors complete the review of the article, the ISTJ EIC submits it to the ISTJ Editorial Board for the publication decision.
17.The ISTJ EIC and the ISTJ Assistant Editor make the final reading of the article for which the publication decision has been made, and follow the layout phase.
18.
The ISTJ EIC puts the completed articles in a queue according to the article acceptance date and the first current issue of different sub-topics to be published in
ISTJ and publishes the following article.
Responsibilities for the ISTJ Statistical Editor
The ISTJ EIC assigns
the ISTJ Statistical Editor while the article is at the preliminary review stage before it goes to referees when necessary.
The ISTJ Statistical Editor reviews the method of the article, the statistical tests used, and the statistical analysis findings and requests raw data tables from authors when necessary. For an article to be sent to referees at
ISTJ, it is mandatory to check the statistical test methods, findings, and comments when necessary. If
the ISTJ Statistical Editor finds the relevant article statistically insufficient or erroneous, he sends it to authors to correct this inadequacy and error. After authors make the edit,
the ISTJ Statistical Editor makes his decision based on the result of the edit.
ISTJ Reviewing Process
Qualified articles that are original, up-to-date, and thought to contribute to the field within the scope of
ISTJ topics are accepted at
ISTJ for preliminary review. Articles that are not original, up-to-date, within the scope of
ISTJ topics, and are thought to be unsuitable for the ISTJ target audience may be returned to authors by
the ISTJ EIC without prior review and without writing a reason for rejection.
The ISTJ EIC has the authority to reject an article submitted to
ISTJ without prior review.
The article submitted to
ISTJ is first sent to the ISTJ Copy Editor to review its compliance with the
ISTJ Article Writing Template. After the submitted article's compliance with the
ISTJ Article Writing Template is approved by the
ISTJ Copy Editor, the relevant article is sent to
the ISTJ EIC or
an ISTJ Subject Editor authorized by
the ISTJ EIC who is familiar with the research topic of the article for a comprehensive review. At the same time,
the ISTJ EIC sends the article to
the ISTJ Statistical Editor to review the accuracy of the statistical test methods and statistical findings used in the article when necessary. The article, which receives a positive report from the control of
the ISTJ EIC or
the ISTJ Subject Editor and
the ISTJ Statistical Editor, is then submitted to review two referees who have expertise in the subject and have at least a doctoral degree.
The refereeing process is carried out confidentially by
the ISTJ EIC, the ISTJ Subject Editor, or
the ISTJ Assistant Editor authorized by
the ISTJ EIC within the double-blind peer review model framework. Referees are requested to express their views and opinions about the article they have reviewed. Referees are asked to explain their positive or negative opinions about the article they have reviewed at least 100 words. Authors can object and defend their opinions if they disagree with referees' opinions.
The ISTJ EIC ensures mutual communication between authors and referees while preserving confidentiality. If one of the two referees expresses a negative opinion, the article may be sent to a third referee for the decision of
the ISTJ EIC or it may be returned to the author without being sent to a third referee. Studies can be published with the positive decision of at least two referees. If both referee reports are positive, the article is sent to the control of
the ISTJ Language Editor. After
the ISTJ Language Editor checks the article, it is presented to
the ISTJ Editorial Board by
the ISTJ EIC with a proposal to consider publication. If
the ISTJ Editorial Board approves the article's publication,
the ISTJ Layout Editor lays out the article and prepares it for the publication. The final reading of the article, the completed layout, is done by
the ISTJ EIC. After the final reading phase, the article is queued according to the acceptance date and the first current issue to be published in
ISTJ, with different sub-topics being equally distributed, and the next article is published.
The ISTJ EIC does not allow conflicts of interest among authors, editors and referees. He has full authority to appoint referees. He ensures that referee reviews are objective. Referees assigned for the refereeing process ensure that the article contains new and important information; the body of the article clearly and neatly describes the content; the method has integrity and understandability; the discussion and conclusion can be proven with findings; there are a sufficient number of references in the research and the quality of the language used is good enough.
Ethical Principles and Responsibilities for ISTJ Reviewers
ISTJ expects reviewers taking part in the reviewing process to comply with the following ethical principles and responsibilities:
1.Reviewers must agree to evaluate only articles related to their expertise.
2.Reviewers must evaluate impartially and confidentially.
3.Reviewers are limited to intellectual and scientific content only when reviewing articles.
4.Reviewers must immediately inform the ISTJ Editor of any author misconduct.
5.Reviewers must not have any conflict of interest regarding the research, authors, and research funders. Their judgments must be objective.
6.Reviewers must ensure the confidentiality of all information regarding the articles they review until the article is published. If they notice that authors have committed copyright infringement or plagiarism, they must immediately report it to the ISTJ EIC.
7. In cases where the use of artificial intelligence is stated or the effect of artificial intelligence is felt in the article, reviewers must take into account the appropriateness of this use, its transparency and the reliability of the results in their reviews.
8.Reviewers who feel they need to be more competent about the article's subject or who think they cannot review the article on time due to workload or various excuses must inform the ISTJ EIC about the issue and request not to be included in the reviewing process.
Responsibilities for the ISTJ Turkish and English Language Editors
The ISTJ Turkish and English Language Editors check the integrity of meaning and the accuracy of spelling rules and punctuation marks in the article. They ask authors for corrections on these issues if there are any errors. For an article to be published in
ISTJ, it is mandatory to check Turkish and English languages.
ISTJ Publication Policy
1.The articles that are not original, up-to-date, suitable for the ISTJ target audience, within the scope of
ISTJ subjects, and do not contribute to the field are returned to authors by
the ISTJ EIC without prior review and without writing a reason for rejection.
The ISTJ EIC has full authority to reject an article submitted to ISTJ without prior review.
2.The qualified articles that are original, up-to-date, thought to contribute to the field within the scope of
ISTJ subjects, and not previously published or under review in another journal for the publication are accepted at
ISTJ for preliminary review.
3.The entire process of the articles is carried out only through the
DergiPark system; other than this, no other communication methods are established with the authors.
4.All the responsibility for similarity belongs to the authors. The main criterion in the similarity rate is that the authors know the rules of citation and comply with these rules. Even if the similarity rate is 1%, if the citation is not done in accordance with the rules, plagiarism may occur. Therefore, the citation rules must be known by the authors and applied carefully
(see APA 7 reference system).Within the scope of the cooperation between
ISTJ, DergiPark, and
intihal.net, a similarity report can be obtained free of charge for article applications. Accordingly, a similarity report is prepared, and authors are notified of the result by e-mail. When the result of the report is announced, the article submission process is completed.
5.Each article accepted for review is first reviewed by
the ISTJ Copy Editor once within a
maximum of 10 days for compliance with
the ISTJ Article Writing Template. If there are any deficiencies or errors in the article template, the responsible author is asked to correct these deficiencies and errors within
7 days at most. If the necessary changes are not made, the author may be given an
additional 5 days. If the author does not make the necessary changes during this period, the article will be rejected and will not be processed again in the same publication period.
6.The article that complies with
the ISTJ Article Writing Template is reviewed comprehensively by either
the ISTJ EIC or
an ISTJ Subject Editor with at least a PhD degree in the research topic of the article in terms of originality, methodology, importance of the research topic, contribution to the field, and suitability for the scope of the journal. At the same time, the article is sent to
the ISTJ Statistical Editor to determine the accuracy of the statistical test methods and statistical findings used in the article when necessary. This review is expected to be completed within
15 days. If the authors are requested to make any corrections at this phase,
the authors and ISTJ Editors are given
15 days for each correction and the responsibilities of the procedures are expected to be fulfilled within this period. The article, which successfully passes the review of the
the ISTJ EIC or
the ISTJ Subject Editor and
the ISTJ Statistical Editor, is then submitted to the review of two referees who have expertise in the subject and have at least a doctoral degree.
7.Articles that pass the preliminary review are reviewed by at least two referees with the double-blind peer review principle. According to the double-blind peer review principle, authors and referees do not know each other's identities. The ISTJ EIC ensures confidentiality throughout the refereeing process. However, after the article review process is completed, whether positive or negative, the names and institutions of the referees who actively participate in the review process are announced in the first issue to be published.
8.Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews within 30 days at the latest. If reviewers request corrections from the article they review, the relevant reports are sent to authors and the article is requested to be corrected as requested. Authors are expected to complete the corrections given to them within 15 days. Reviewers who want to see the correction are expected to approve the correction or send it back for correction within 15 days. It works like this until the peer review process is completed.
9.If one of the two reviewers rejects the article, the ISTJ EIC may send it to a third referee for review, depending on its current status and the reasoning of the reviewer who has made the rejection decision, or may reject the article without sending it to a third referee and return it to the author. The article can be published with a positive decision from at least two reviewers.
10.The article whose review process has been completed is reviewed by the ISTJ Turkish and English Language Editors within 10 days at the latest, and if necessary, the ISTJ Language Editors may request corrections from authors. In these corrections, the ISTJ Language Editors and the responsible author are given separate periods of 10 days each, and the process continues like this until it is completed.
11.The ISTJ Editorial Board makes the publication decision after referees accept the article and The ISTJ Language Editors complete their review. The members of the ISTJ Editorial Board may also provide corrections to authors.
12. The layout of the article, which is decided to be published by the ISTJ Editorial Board unanimously or by majority vote, is done by the ISTJ Layout Editor within 10 days.
13. The final reading of the article, the layout of which is completed, is done by
the ISTJ Editor or the ISTJ Assistant Editor within
10 days.
The ISTJ Editor queues the completed articles according to the article acceptance date and the first current issue of different subtopics to be published in
ISTJ and publishes the following article.
14.Data of published articles are transmitted to the relevant indexes within 10 days at the latest.
15.A maximum of one study by the same author is published in the same issue.
16.All the articles that do not comply with ethical principles (plagiarism, forgery, distortion, duplication, false authorship/denied authorship, research/data fabrication, article slicing, publication by slicing, copyright violation, concealment of conflict of interest, other ethical violations) are removed from the publication. These include the unethical articles that can be detected later even after they are published.
17.Legal responsibilities arising from the content of the articles published in
ISTJ belong entirely to the authors.
June 30, 2025
Page
1-27
