Journal of Yaşar University
Cover Image
ISSN 1305-970X | Period Quarterly | Founded: 2006 | Publisher Yasar University | journal.yasar.edu.tr

Peer Reviewing of articles is an essential part of the publishing process for scholarly work, and is employed by all reputable scientific journals. It is an objective process that often provides useful feedback to authors and ensures that their work is presented in the best possible way. The Editorial Board of Journal of Yasar University would like to take this opportunity of publicly thanking our referees, past, present and future, for giving us their valuable time and for their vital contribution to the success of this journal. 

• Initial Screening: Each manuscript is reviewed by a member of the Editorial Board, who may suggest referees if the paper passes the initial evaluation. Authors of papers rejected at this stage will be informed within about two weeks of submission. 

• Reviewing Process: The Editor may seek the advice of up to three referees, chosen in consultation with appropriate members of the Editorial Board, from among experts in the field of specialization of the paper. Referees are asked to comment on the originality and scientific correctness of the work, and to note deviations from appropriate ethical guidelines, lack of references to the available literature, etc. A referee may recommend acceptance, perhaps following minor corrections; acceptance conditional on the successful completion of a more extensive revision; re-evaluation following a major revision that may involve extensions to the original manuscript; or rejection. The time taken by the reviewing process will vary, depending on such factors as the availability of appropriate referees, the number and nature of any requested revisions, etc., but every effort is made to complete this process as quickly as possible. 

• Confidentiality: The reviewing process is conducted in strict confidence and the identity of a referee is not disclosed to the authors at any point.

• Final Decision: At the completion of the reviewing process the Editor makes the final decision to accept or reject the article. This decision is communicated to the corresponding author, together with any remaining feedback from the referees.​

Journal of Yaşar University

ISSN 1305-970X | Period Quarterly | Founded: 2006 | Publisher Yasar University | journal.yasar.edu.tr
Cover Image

174.495

331.939

Peer Reviewing of articles is an essential part of the publishing process for scholarly work, and is employed by all reputable scientific journals. It is an objective process that often provides useful feedback to authors and ensures that their work is presented in the best possible way. The Editorial Board of Journal of Yasar University would like to take this opportunity of publicly thanking our referees, past, present and future, for giving us their valuable time and for their vital contribution to the success of this journal. 

• Initial Screening: Each manuscript is reviewed by a member of the Editorial Board, who may suggest referees if the paper passes the initial evaluation. Authors of papers rejected at this stage will be informed within about two weeks of submission. 

• Reviewing Process: The Editor may seek the advice of up to three referees, chosen in consultation with appropriate members of the Editorial Board, from among experts in the field of specialization of the paper. Referees are asked to comment on the originality and scientific correctness of the work, and to note deviations from appropriate ethical guidelines, lack of references to the available literature, etc. A referee may recommend acceptance, perhaps following minor corrections; acceptance conditional on the successful completion of a more extensive revision; re-evaluation following a major revision that may involve extensions to the original manuscript; or rejection. The time taken by the reviewing process will vary, depending on such factors as the availability of appropriate referees, the number and nature of any requested revisions, etc., but every effort is made to complete this process as quickly as possible. 

• Confidentiality: The reviewing process is conducted in strict confidence and the identity of a referee is not disclosed to the authors at any point.

• Final Decision: At the completion of the reviewing process the Editor makes the final decision to accept or reject the article. This decision is communicated to the corresponding author, together with any remaining feedback from the referees.​

Journal of Yaşar April 2019 Last Issue
Volume 14 - Issue 54 - Apr 2019
  1. Nisan 2019 Editoryal

    Yaşar Üniversitesi
  2. Kırsal Kalkınmanın Sağlanmasında Kadın İstihdamı: Afyonkarahisar Gazlıgöl Termal Turizm Bölgesi Araştırması
    Pages 87 - 95
    Alper Ateş, Mustafa Başaran
  3. Electricity Consumption, Oil Prices, Gross Fixed Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence From G7 Countries
    Pages 96 - 105
    Tuncer Govdeli
  4. Türkiye İçin Kısa Vadeli Sermaye Akımları ve Reel Döviz Kurunun Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkilerine İlişkin Uygulamalı Bir Araştırma
    Pages 106 - 118
    Fatih Ayhan
  5. KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLUK VE KURUMSAL YÖNETİM ARASINDAKİ ETKİLEŞİMİN VERİ ZARFLAMA İLE ANALİZİ: BİST KURUMSAL YÖNETİM ENDEKSİNDEKİ FİRMALAR ÜZERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA
    Pages 119 - 126
    Dursun Boz, Cengiz DURAN
  6. Borsa İstanbul Şirketlerinin Kapsamlı Gelir Raporlama Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma
    Pages 127 - 140
    Merve Kılıç
  7. Investigation of Foreign Trade between Turkey and Member Countries of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) with Gravity Model
    Pages 141 - 151
    HATİCE ERKEKOĞLU, BURCU YILMAZ
  8. Factors That Impact the Logistics Service Performance in Online Marketplaces
    Pages 152 - 167
    Metehan Feridun Sorkun
  9. Ülke Marka Kişiliği: İsveç’te Türkiye Algısı
    Pages 168 - 179
    Elem Demir
  10. Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Psikolojik Taciz (Mobbing) Üzerine Bir Araştırma
    Pages 180 - 195
    Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, Özer Depren, Serpil Kılıç Depren
  11. SOSYAL MEDYADA KİŞİSEL MARKALAMA: NUSR-ET INSTAGRAM ÖRNEĞİ
    Pages 196 - 207
    Feyyaz Kaya, Y. Zafer Can Uğurhan, Sevil Uzoğlu Bayçu
  12. COMPARISON OF ENTREPRENEURIAL PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MALE AND FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS
    Pages 208 - 214
    Süreyya ECE